SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Badura Lotter Gisela)
 

Search: WFRF:(Badura Lotter Gisela) > (2017) > Existential decisio...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Existential decision-making in a fatal progressive disease : how much do legal and medical frameworks matter?

Weber, Christian (author)
Fijalkowska, Barbara (author)
Ciecwierska, Katarzyna (author)
show more...
Lindblad, Anna (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Badura-Lotter, Gisela (author)
Andersen, Peter M. (author)
Umeå universitet,Klinisk neurovetenskap
Kuzma-Kozakiewicz, Magdalena (author)
Ludolph, Albert C. (author)
Lule, Dorothee (author)
Pasierski, Tomasz (author)
Lynoee, Niels (author)
Karolinska Institutet
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2017-12-28
2017
English.
In: BMC Palliative Care. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1472-684X. ; 16
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: Healthcare legislation in European countries is similar in many respects. Most importantly, the framework of informed consent determines that physicians have the duty to provide detailed information about available therapeutic options and that patients have the right to refuse measures that contradict their personal values. However, when it comes to end-of-life decision-making a number of differences exist in the more specific regulations of individual countries. These differences and how they might nevertheless impact patient’s choices will be addressed in the current debate.Main text: In this article we show how the legal and medical frameworks of Germany, Poland and Sweden differ with regard to end-of-life decisions for patients with a fatal progressive disease. Taking Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) as an example, we systematically compare clinical guidelines and healthcare law, pointing out the country-specific differences most relevant for existential decision-making. A fictional case report discusses the implications of these differences for a patient with ALS living in either of the three countries. Patients with ALS in Germany, Poland and Sweden are confronted with a similar spectrum of treatment options. However, the analysis of the normative frameworks shows that the conditions for making existential decisions differ considerably in Germany, Poland and Sweden. Specifically, these differences concern (1) the legal status of advance directives, (2) the conditions under which life-sustaining therapies are started or withheld, and (3) the legal regulations on assisted dying.Conclusion: According to the presented data, regulations of terminating life-sustaining treatments and the framework of “informed consent” are quite differently understood and implemented in the legal setting of the three countries. It is possible, and even likely, that these differences in the legal and medical frameworks have a considerable influence on existential decisions of patients with ALS.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Medicinsk etik (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Medical Ethics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Shared decision-making
Therapeutic treatment
Palliative care
vance directive
Germany
Poland
Sweden

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view