Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-166565" > How Does Socio-inst...
Fältnamn | Indikatorer | Metadata |
---|---|---|
000 | 03550naa a2200421 4500 | |
001 | oai:DiVA.org:su-166565 | |
003 | SwePub | |
008 | 190304s2019 | |||||||||||000 ||eng| | |
024 | 7 | a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-1665652 URI |
024 | 7 | a https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1123-52 DOI |
040 | a (SwePub)su | |
041 | a engb eng | |
042 | 9 SwePub | |
072 | 7 | a ref2 swepub-contenttype |
072 | 7 | a art2 swepub-publicationtype |
100 | 1 | a Baird, Julia4 aut |
245 | 1 0 | a How Does Socio-institutional Diversity Affect Collaborative Governance of Social-Ecological Systems in Practice? |
264 | c 2018-11-13 | |
264 | 1 | b Springer Science and Business Media LLC,c 2019 |
338 | a print2 rdacarrier | |
520 | a Social and institutional diversity (diversity hereafter) are important dimensions in collaborative environmental governance, but lack empirical assessment. In this paper, we examine three aspects of diversity hypothesized in the literature as being important in collaborative forms of environmental governancethe presence of diverse actors, diverse perspectives, and diverse institutions. The presence of these aspects and formative conjectures were empirically considered using a mixed methods approach in four biosphere reserves in Sweden and Canada. We found that the diversity of actors involved and domains of authority varied among cases, that stakeholder perspectives were highly diverse in all cases, and that institutional variety (in terms of strategies, norms, and rules) was evident in all cases, but differed among them. Empirical support from the cases further affirms that diversity contributes to the ability to engage with a broader set of issues and challenges; diversity contributes to novel approaches to solving problems within the governance group; and diversity contributes to the flexibility of the group involved in governance in terms of addressing challenges. One conjecture, that diversity decreases the efficiency of governance in decision-making and responding to issues, was not supported by the data. However, our analysis indicates that there might be a trade-off between diversity and efficiency. The findings highlight differences in the ways in which diversity is conceptualized in the literature and on the ground, emphasizing the pragmatic advantages of actively seeking diversity in terms of competencies and capacities. | |
650 | 7 | a NATURVETENSKAPx Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap0 (SwePub)1052 hsv//swe |
650 | 7 | a NATURAL SCIENCESx Earth and Related Environmental Sciences0 (SwePub)1052 hsv//eng |
650 | 7 | a NATURVETENSKAPx Biologix Ekologi0 (SwePub)106112 hsv//swe |
650 | 7 | a NATURAL SCIENCESx Biological Sciencesx Ecology0 (SwePub)106112 hsv//eng |
653 | a Biosphere reserves | |
653 | a Bridging organizations | |
653 | a Diversity | |
653 | a Resilience | |
653 | a Collaborative environmental governance | |
700 | 1 | a Plummer, Ryan4 aut |
700 | 1 | a Schultz, Lisenu Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre4 aut0 (Swepub:su)lschu |
700 | 1 | a Armitage, Derek4 aut |
700 | 1 | a Bodin, Örjanu Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre4 aut0 (Swepub:su)rbodi |
710 | 2 | a Stockholms universitetb Stockholm Resilience Centre4 org |
773 | 0 | t Environmental Managementd : Springer Science and Business Media LLCg 63:2, s. 200-214q 63:2<200-214x 0364-152Xx 1432-1009 |
856 | 4 8 | u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-166565 |
856 | 4 8 | u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1123-5 |
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy