SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-88749"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-88749" > Arctic Ocean freshw...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003588naa a2200481 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:su-88749
003SwePub
008130326s2012 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
0247 a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-887492 URI
0247 a https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC0079072 DOI
040 a (SwePub)su
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
1001 a Jahn, A.4 aut
2451 0a Arctic Ocean freshwater :b How robust are model simulations?
264 1c 2012
338 a print2 rdacarrier
500 a AuthorCount:15;
520 a The Arctic freshwater (FW) has been the focus of many modeling studies, due to the potential impact of Arctic FW on the deep water formation in the North Atlantic. A comparison of the hindcasts from ten ocean-sea ice models shows that the simulation of the Arctic FW budget is quite different in the investigated models. While they agree on the general sink and source terms of the Arctic FW budget, the long-term means as well as the variability of the FW export vary among models. The best model-to-model agreement is found for the interannual and seasonal variability of the solid FW export and the solid FW storage, which also agree well with observations. For the interannual and seasonal variability of the liquid FW export, the agreement among models is better for the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) than for Fram Strait. The reason for this is that models are more consistent in simulating volume flux anomalies than salinity anomalies and volume-flux anomalies dominate the liquid FW export variability in the CAA but not in Fram Strait. The seasonal cycle of the liquid FW export generally shows a better agreement among models than the interannual variability, and compared to observations the models capture the seasonality of the liquid FW export rather well. In order to improve future simulations of the Arctic FW budget, the simulation of the salinity field needs to be improved, so that model results on the variability of the liquid FW export and storage become more robust. Citation: Jahn, A., et al. (2012), Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C00D16, doi: 10.1029/2012JC007907.
650 7a NATURVETENSKAPx Geovetenskap och miljövetenskapx Oceanografi, hydrologi och vattenresurser0 (SwePub)105092 hsv//swe
650 7a NATURAL SCIENCESx Earth and Related Environmental Sciencesx Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources0 (SwePub)105092 hsv//eng
653 a atmosfärvetenskap och oceanografi
653 a Atmospheric Sciences and Oceanography
7001 a Aksenov, Y.4 aut
7001 a de Cuevas, B. A.4 aut
7001 a de Steur, L.4 aut
7001 a Hakkinen, S.4 aut
7001 a Hansen, E.4 aut
7001 a Herbaut, C.4 aut
7001 a Houssais, M. -N4 aut
7001 a Karcher, M.4 aut
7001 a Kauker, F.4 aut
7001 a Lique, C.4 aut
7001 a Nguyen, A.4 aut
7001 a Pemberton, Per,d 1976-u Stockholms universitet,Meteorologiska institutionen (MISU),Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Sweden4 aut0 (Swepub:su)pepe5297
7001 a Worthen, D.4 aut
7001 a Zhang, J.4 aut
7102 a Stockholms universitetb Meteorologiska institutionen (MISU)4 org
7730 t Journal of Geophysical Researchg 117, s. C00D16-q 117<C00D16-x 0148-0227x 2156-2202
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-88749
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007907

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy