Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-91940" >
The available evide...
The available evidence suggests the percent measure should not be used to study inequality : Reply to Norton and Ariely
-
- Eriksson, Kimmo, 1967- (författare)
- Mälardalens högskola,Stockholms universitet,Centrum för evolutionär kulturforskning,Akademin för utbildning, kultur och kommunikation
-
- Simpson, Brent (författare)
- University of South Carolina
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2023-01-01
- 2013
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Judgment and Decision Making. - : Cambridge University Press (CUP). - 1930-2975. ; 8:3, s. 395-396
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa fler...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- In this reply, we reiterate the main point of our 2012 paper, which was that the measure of inequality used by Norton and Ariely (2011) was too difficult for it to yield meaningful results. We describe additional evidence for this conclusion, and we also challenge the conclusion that political differences in perceived and desired inequality are small.
Ämnesord
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Psychology (hsv//eng)
- NATURVETENSKAP -- Matematik (hsv//swe)
- NATURAL SCIENCES -- Mathematics (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- perceived inequality
- measurement of judgment
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- vet (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas