SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-293490"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-293490" > Does model performa...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Does model performance improve with complexity? : A case study with three hydrological models

Orth, Rene (author)
Staudinger, Maria (author)
Seneviratne, Sonia I. (author)
show more...
Seibert, J., 1968- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Luft-, vatten- och landskapslära,Luft-, vatten- och landskapslära
Zappa, Massimiliano (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2015
2015
English.
In: Journal of Hydrology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0022-1694 .- 1879-2707. ; 523, s. 147-159
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • In recent decades considerable progress has been made in climate model development. Following the massive increase in computational power, models became more sophisticated. At the same time also simple conceptual models have advanced. In this study we validate and compare three hydrological models of different complexity to investigate whether their performance varies accordingly. For this purpose we use runoff and also soil moisture measurements, which allow a truly independent validation, from several sites across Switzerland. The models are calibrated in similar ways with the same runoff data. Our results show that the more complex models HBV and PREVAH outperform the simple water balance model (SWBM) in case of runoff but not for soil moisture. Furthermore the most sophisticated PREVAH model shows an added value compared to the HBV model only in case of soil moisture. Focusing on extreme events we find generally improved performance of the SWBM during drought conditions and degraded agreement with observations during wet extremes. For the more complex models we find the opposite behavior, probably because they were primarily developed for prediction of runoff extremes. As expected given their complexity, HBV and PREVAH have more problems with over-fitting. All models show a tendency towards better performance in lower altitudes as opposed to (pre-) alpine sites. The results vary considerably across the investigated sites. In contrast, the different metrics we consider to estimate the agreement between models and observations lead to similar conclusions, indicating that the performance of the considered models is similar at different time scales as well as for anomalies and long-term means. We conclude that added complexity does not necessarily lead to improved performance of hydrological models, and that performance can vary greatly depending on the considered hydrological variable (e.g. runoff vs. soil moisture) or hydrological conditions (floods vs. droughts). (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap -- Oceanografi, hydrologi och vattenresurser (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences -- Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources (hsv//eng)

Keyword

continuous simulation
evapotranspiration
flood estimation
Hydrological model comparison
regionalization
runoff-model
Runoff validation
Simple conceptual model as benchmark
soil-moisture memory
Soil moisture validation
Switzerland
ungauged mesoscale catchments
variability
water-balance

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view