SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-7113"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-7113" > Some Basic Issues i...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003064nam a2200397 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:uu-7113
003SwePub
008060907s2006 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
020 a 9150618954q print
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-71132 URI
040 a (SwePub)uu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a vet2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a dok2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Svensson, Frans,d 1976-u Uppsala universitet,Filosofiska institutionen4 aut
2451 0a Some Basic Issues in Neo-Aristotelian Virtue Ethics
264 1a Uppsala :b Filosofiska institutionen,c 2006
300 a 96 s.
338 a print2 rdacarrier
520 a During the last three or four decades, a number of moral philosophers have moved in the direction of virtue ethics (VE). In this essay we begin by providing an outline of the main features of VE. It is argued that the basic normative requirement of VE is to aspire towards developing a morally virtuous character. Moral virtues, furthermore, are conceived of in a basically Aristotelian way: as well entrenched dispositions of character to deliberate and make decisions in accordance with correct reason, as well as to habitually act and feel in morally appropriate ways. We then proceed to discussing three basic issues in VE more thoroughly. In chapter 3 it is argued that while VE primarily focuses on what we should aim to be like, it also has something to say about what we ought to do. Ultimately a developmental account of right action, according to which what counts as right action depends on our specific levels of virtuous development, is defended. In chapter 4 it is argued that VE does not constitute a kind of moral elitism. Even if the practice of full virtue is limited to a very few people, the rest of us are still in a position to aspire towards becoming more virtuous than we presently are. And that is what VE require of us. Finally, in chapter 5, we discuss the plausibility of neo-Aristotelian naturalism. This is a form of naturalism that is usually put forward as an alternative to non-cognitivist views in meta-ethics and it is commonly taken to be closely associated with VE. It is argued that neo-Aristotelian naturalism is flawed. However, since VE is first and foremost a normative ethical theory, it is not committed to any particular position in meta-ethics. Hence, even if neo-Aristotelian naturalism fails, VE may still survive intact.
653 a Philosophy
653 a Aristotle
653 a elitism
653 a expressivism
653 a neo-Aristotelian naturalism
653 a right action
653 a virtue ethics (VE)
653 a Filosofi
653 a Practical Philosophy
653 a praktisk filosofi
700a Danielsson, Sven4 ths
700a Carlson, Erik4 ths
700a Annas, Julia,c Professoru Department of Philosophy, Tucson4 opn
710a Uppsala universitetb Filosofiska institutionen4 org
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7113

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy