SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/243922"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/243922" > Turned versus anodi...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Turned versus anodised dental implants: a meta-analysis

Chrcanovic, Bruno (author)
Malmö högskola,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD),Biofilms Research Center for Biointerfaces
Albrektsson, Tomas, 1945 (author)
Malmö högskola,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Biomaterials,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD),Biofilms Research Center for Biointerfaces
Wennerberg, Ann (author)
Malmö högskola,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD),Biofilms Research Center for Biointerfaces
 (creator_code:org_t)
2016-06-13
2016
English.
In: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. - : Wiley. - 0305-182X .- 1365-2842. ; 43:9, s. 716-728
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The aim of this meta-analysis was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in the implant failure rates, marginal bone loss (MBL)and post-operative infection for patients being rehabilitated by turned versus anodised-surface implants, against the alternative hypothesis of a difference. An electronic search without time or language restrictions was undertaken in November 2015. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies, either randomised or not. Thirty-eight publications were included. The results suggest a risk ratio of 2·82 (95% CI 1·95–4·06, P<0·00001) for failure of turned implants, when compared to anodised-surface implants. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results when only the studies inserting implants in maxillae or mandibles were pooled. There were no statistically significant effects of turned implants on the MBL (mean difference-MD 0·02, 95%CI −0·16–0·20; P=0·82) in comparison to anodised implants. The results of a meta-regression considering the follow-up period as a covariate suggested an increase of the MD with the increase in the follow-up time (MD increase 0·012mmyear−1), however, without a statistical significance (P=0·813). Due to lack of satisfactory information, meta-analysis for the outcome ‘post-operative infection’ was not performed. The results have to be interpreted with caution due to the presence of several confounding factors in the included studies. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Oto-rhino-laryngologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Otorhinolaryngology (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kirurgi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Surgery (hsv//eng)

Keyword

anodised implants
dental implants
implant failure rate
marginal bone loss
meta-analysis
turned implants
Dental implants

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Chrcanovic, Brun ...
Albrektsson, Tom ...
Wennerberg, Ann
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Dentistry
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Otorhinolaryngol ...
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Surgery
Articles in the publication
Journal of Oral ...
By the university
University of Gothenburg
Malmö University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view