id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/283096"
Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/283096" > A systematic review...
- 1 av 1
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
| Fältnamn | Indikatorer | Metadata |
|---|---|---|
| 000 | 04915naa a2200517 4500 | |
| 001 | oai:gup.ub.gu.se/283096 | |
| 003 | SwePub | |
| 008 | 240528s2019 | |||||||||||000 ||eng| | |
| 024 | 7 | a https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/2830962 URI |
| 024 | 7 | a https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.005672 DOI |
| 040 | a (SwePub)gu | |
| 041 | a eng | |
| 042 | 9 SwePub | |
| 072 | 7 | a ref2 swepub-contenttype |
| 072 | 7 | a art2 swepub-publicationtype |
| 100 | 1 | a Burridge, J.4 aut |
| 245 | 1 0 | a A systematic review of international clinical guidelines for rehabilitation of people with neurological conditions: What recommendations are made for upperlimb assessment? |
| 264 | c 2019-06-25 | |
| 264 | 1 | b Frontiers Media SA,c 2019 |
| 520 | a Background: Upper limb impairment is a common problem for people with neurological disabilities, affecting activity, performance, quality of life, and independence. Accurate, timely assessments are required for effective rehabilitation, and development of novel interventions. International consensus on upper limb assessment is needed to make research findings more meaningful, provide a benchmark for quality in clinical practice, more cost-effective neurorehabilitation and improved outcomes for neurological patients undergoing rehabilitation. Aim: To conduct a systematic review, as part of the output of a European COST Action, to identify what recommendations are made for upper limb assessment. Methods: We systematically reviewed published guidance on measures and protocols for assessment of upper limb function in neurological rehabilitation via electronic databases from January 2007-December 2017. Additional records were then identified through other sources. Records were selected for inclusion based on scanning of titles, abstracts and full text by two authors working independently, and a third author if there was disagreement. Records were included if they referred to "rehabilitation" and "assessment" or "measurement". Reasons for exclusion were documented. Results: From the initial 552 records identified (after duplicates were removed), 34 satisfied our criteria for inclusion, and only six recommended specific outcome measures and /or protocols. Records were divided into National Guidelines and other practice guidelines published in peer reviewed Journals. There was agreement that assessment is critical, should be conducted early and at regular intervals and that there is a need for standardized measures. Assessments should be conducted by a healthcare professional trained in using the measure and should encompass body function and structure, activity and participation. Conclusions: We present a comprehensive, critical, and original summary of current recommendations. Defining a core set of measures and agreed protocols requires international consensus between experts representing the diverse and multi-disciplinary field of neurorehabilitation including clinical researchers and practitioners, rehabilitation technology researchers, and commercial developers. Current lack of guidance may hold-back progress in understanding function and recovery. Together with a Delphi consensus study and an overview of systematic reviews of outcome measures it will contribute to the development of international guidelines for upper limb assessment in neurological conditions. © 2019 Burridge, Alt Murphy, Buurke, Feys, Keller, Klamroth-Marganska, Lamers, McNicholas, Prange, Tarkka, Timmermans and Hughes. | |
| 650 | 7 | a MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAPx Klinisk medicinx Neurologi0 (SwePub)302072 hsv//swe |
| 650 | 7 | a MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCESx Clinical Medicinex Neurology0 (SwePub)302072 hsv//eng |
| 653 | a Activity | |
| 653 | a Guidelines | |
| 653 | a Impairment | |
| 653 | a Neurological conditions | |
| 653 | a Outcome and process assessment | |
| 653 | a Practice guidelines | |
| 653 | a Systematic review | |
| 653 | a Upper limb | |
| 700 | 1 | a Alt Murphy, Margit,d 1970u Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för klinisk neurovetenskap,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience4 aut0 (Swepub:gu)xaltma |
| 700 | 1 | a Buurke, J.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a Feys, P.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a Keller, T.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a Klamroth-Marganska, V.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a Lamers, I.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a McNicholas, L.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a Prange, G.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a Tarkka, I.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a Timmermans, A.4 aut |
| 700 | 1 | a Hughes, A. M.4 aut |
| 710 | 2 | a Göteborgs universitetb Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för klinisk neurovetenskap4 org |
| 773 | 0 | t Frontiers in Neurologyd : Frontiers Media SAg 10q 10x 1664-2295 |
| 856 | 4 | u https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00567 |
| 856 | 4 8 | u https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/283096 |
| 856 | 4 8 | u https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00567 |
- 1 av 1
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
Hitta mer i SwePub
- Av författaren/redakt...
- Burridge, J.
- Alt Murphy, Marg ...
- Buurke, J.
- Feys, P.
- Keller, T.
- Klamroth-Margans ...
- visa fler...
- Lamers, I.
- McNicholas, L.
- Prange, G.
- Tarkka, I.
- Timmermans, A.
- Hughes, A. M.
- visa färre...
- Om ämnet
-
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
- och Klinisk medicin
- och Neurologi
- Artiklar i publikationen
- Frontiers in Neu ...
- Av lärosätet
- Göteborgs universitet
Sök utanför SwePub
- Sök vidare i:
- Google Book Search
- Google Scholar
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
- Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem
- LIBRIS.kb.se
