Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:slubar.slu.se:93701" > Can Friends be Copi...
Fältnamn | Indikatorer | Metadata |
---|---|---|
000 | 02828naa a2200313 4500 | |
001 | oai:slubar.slu.se:93701 | |
003 | SwePub | |
008 | 240410s2018 | |||||||||||000 ||eng| | |
024 | 7 | a https://res.slu.se/id/publ/937012 URI |
024 | 7 | a https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9706-y2 DOI |
040 | a (SwePub)slu | |
041 | a engb eng | |
042 | 9 SwePub | |
072 | 7 | a ref2 swepub-contenttype |
072 | 7 | a art2 swepub-publicationtype |
100 | 1 | a Röcklinsberg, Helenau Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för husdjurens miljö och hälsa (HMH),Department of Animal Environment and Health4 aut0 (Swepub:slu)48483 |
245 | 1 0 | a Can Friends be Copied? Ethical Aspects of Cloning Dogs as Companion Animals |
264 | c 2018-01-12 | |
264 | 1 | b Springer Science and Business Media LLC,c 2018 |
264 | 1 | b Springer Verlag (Germany),c 2024 |
520 | a Since the first successful attempt to clone a dog in 2005, dogs have been cloned by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT) for a variety of purposes. One of these is to clone dogs as companion animals. In this paper we discuss some of the ethical implications that cloning companion dogs through SCNT encompasses, specifically in relation to human-dog relationships, but also regarding animal welfare and animal integrity. We argue that insofar as we understand the relationship with our companion dogs as one of friendship, the meaningfulness of cloning a companion dog is seriously questionable. Cloning may both disrupt the uniqueness of the relationship, as the shared history underlying the relationship can neither be repeated nor copied, and it may violate the meaning we attribute to friendship, as the notion of singularity inherent in our understanding of friendship is incompatible with the replaceability embedded in the practice of cloning. We further argue that the application of cloning technology to companion dogs can be interpreted as a violation of the integrity of dogs on at least two accounts: negative welfare implications associated with the cloning process, and the instrumentalisation of the dog inherent in cloning. | |
650 | 7 | a LANTBRUKSVETENSKAPERx Veterinärmedicinx Klinisk vetenskap0 (SwePub)403032 hsv//swe |
650 | 7 | a AGRICULTURAL SCIENCESx Veterinary Sciencex Clinical Science0 (SwePub)403032 hsv//eng |
710 | 2 | a Sveriges lantbruksuniversitetb Institutionen för husdjurens miljö och hälsa (HMH)4 org |
710 | 2 | a Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet |
773 | 0 | t Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethicsd : Springer Science and Business Media LLCg 31, s. 17-29q 31<17-29x 1187-7863x 1573-322X |
856 | 4 | u https://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/245670445/s12876_020_01356_2.pdf |
856 | 4 8 | u https://res.slu.se/id/publ/93701 |
856 | 4 8 | u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9706-y |
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.