SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-268018"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-268018" > A simulator-based c...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003047naa a2200445 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:kth-268018
003SwePub
008200322s2019 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-2680182 URI
024a https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions40400582 DOI
040 a (SwePub)kth
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Svenner, A.4 aut
2451 0a A simulator-based comparison of a novel 3d and a conventional 3d vision system-surgical performance and subjective ratings
264 c 2019-09-27
264 1b MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute,c 2019
338 a print2 rdacarrier
500 a QC 20200322
520 a In laparoscopy, novel three-dimensional laparoscopic vision systems (3D LVS) without glasses (3D−) have been invented. While standard 3D LVS with glasses (3D+) have shown advantages over original two-dimensional systems, quantitative comparisons of surgical performance between 3D− and 3D+ systems are still lacking. The aim is to compare the systems in simulated robotic surgery tasks. In a crossover study, 18 medical students performed four basic laparoscopic tasks in the validated Simball Box simulator with authentic surgical instruments by using the 3D+ and 3D− systems. Performance was measured by the number of errors and the task’s duration. Subjective ratings of perceptions and preference were assessed after each test. There were significant, but still minor, advantages for the conventional 3D+ system regarding spatial orientation and sense of depth. Overall, ten and eight subjects preferred 3D+ and 3D− systems, respectively. No significant differences were found in performance, post-operative physicals or eye symptoms. The novel 3D− system was similar to the conventional 3D+ system regarding performance and overall preference, while there were minor advantages for the 3D+ system in the subjective ratings. Since the 3D− system is a new invention, it should have a higher potential of usability improvements.
650 7a MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAPx Klinisk medicin0 (SwePub)3022 hsv//swe
650 7a MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCESx Clinical Medicine0 (SwePub)3022 hsv//eng
653 a 3D monitor
653 a Glasses-less
653 a Laparoscopy
653 a Validation
653 a Visual ergonomics
700a Fan, X.4 aut
700a Forsman, Mikaelu KTH,Ergonomi4 aut0 (Swepub:kth)u1iq0ct2
700a Shabo, I.4 aut
700a Hallbeck, M. S.4 aut
700a Kjellman, M.4 aut
710a KTHb Ergonomi4 org
773t Inventionsd : MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteg 4:4q 4:4x 2411-5134
856u https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions4040058y Fulltext
856u https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5134/4/4/58/pdf
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-268018
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions4040058

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Svenner, A.
Fan, X.
Forsman, Mikael
Shabo, I.
Hallbeck, M. S.
Kjellman, M.
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Klinisk medicin
Artiklar i publikationen
Inventions
Av lärosätet
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy