Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-53719" > Manipulation does n...
Fältnamn | Indikatorer | Metadata |
---|---|---|
000 | 03119naa a2200313 4500 | |
001 | oai:DiVA.org:uu-53719 | |
003 | SwePub | |
008 | 081017s1998 | |||||||||||000 ||eng| | |
024 | 7 | a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-537192 URI |
040 | a (SwePub)uu | |
041 | a engb eng | |
042 | 9 SwePub | |
072 | 7 | a ref2 swepub-contenttype |
072 | 7 | a art2 swepub-publicationtype |
100 | 1 | a Tullberg, T4 aut |
245 | 1 0 | a Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint :b a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis |
264 | 1 | c 1998 |
338 | a print2 rdacarrier | |
520 | a STUDY DESIGN A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis study of patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether manipulation can influence the position between the ilium and the sacrum, and whether positional tests for the sacroiliac joint are valid. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a subject of controversy. The validity of different sacroiliac joint tests is unknown. Long-standing therapeutic tradition is to manipulate supposed dysfunctions of the sacroiliac joint. Many manual therapists claim that their good clinical results are a consequence of a reduction of subluxation. METHODS Ten patients with symptoms and sacroiliac joint tests results indicating unilateral sacroiliac joint dysfunction were recruited. Twelve sacroiliac joint tests were chosen. The results of most of these tests were required to be positive before manipulation and normalized after manipulation. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis was performed with the patient in the standing position, before and after treatment. RESULTS In none of the 10 patients did manipulation alter the position of the sacrum in relation to the ilium, defined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Positional test results changed from positive before manipulation to normal after. CONCLUSIONS Manipulation of the sacroiliac joint normalized different types of clinical test results but was not accompanied by altered position of the sacroiliac joint, according to roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Therefore, the positional test results were not valid. However, the current results neither disprove nor prove possible beneficial clinical effects achieved by manipulation of the sacroiliac joint. Because the supposed positive effects are not a result of a reduction of subluxation, further studies of the effects of manipulation should focus on the soft tissue response. | |
653 | a manipulation | |
653 | a mobilization | |
653 | a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis | |
653 | a sacroiliac joint | |
700 | 1 | a Blomberg, Stefanu Department of Orthopaedics, St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden4 aut0 (Swepub:uu)stefblom |
700 | 1 | a Branth, B4 aut |
700 | 1 | a Johnsson, R4 aut |
710 | 2 | a Department of Orthopaedics, St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden4 org |
773 | 0 | t Spineg 23:10, s. 1124-1128, discussion 1129q 23:10<1124-1128, discussion 1129x 0362-2436x 1528-1159 |
856 | 4 8 | u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-53719 |
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.