SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-53719"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-53719" > Manipulation does n...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003119naa a2200313 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:uu-53719
003SwePub
008081017s1998 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-537192 URI
040 a (SwePub)uu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Tullberg, T4 aut
2451 0a Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint :b a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis
264 1c 1998
338 a print2 rdacarrier
520 a STUDY DESIGN A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis study of patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether manipulation can influence the position between the ilium and the sacrum, and whether positional tests for the sacroiliac joint are valid. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a subject of controversy. The validity of different sacroiliac joint tests is unknown. Long-standing therapeutic tradition is to manipulate supposed dysfunctions of the sacroiliac joint. Many manual therapists claim that their good clinical results are a consequence of a reduction of subluxation. METHODS Ten patients with symptoms and sacroiliac joint tests results indicating unilateral sacroiliac joint dysfunction were recruited. Twelve sacroiliac joint tests were chosen. The results of most of these tests were required to be positive before manipulation and normalized after manipulation. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis was performed with the patient in the standing position, before and after treatment. RESULTS In none of the 10 patients did manipulation alter the position of the sacrum in relation to the ilium, defined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Positional test results changed from positive before manipulation to normal after. CONCLUSIONS Manipulation of the sacroiliac joint normalized different types of clinical test results but was not accompanied by altered position of the sacroiliac joint, according to roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Therefore, the positional test results were not valid. However, the current results neither disprove nor prove possible beneficial clinical effects achieved by manipulation of the sacroiliac joint. Because the supposed positive effects are not a result of a reduction of subluxation, further studies of the effects of manipulation should focus on the soft tissue response.
653 a manipulation
653 a mobilization
653 a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis
653 a sacroiliac joint
700a Blomberg, Stefanu Department of Orthopaedics, St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden4 aut0 (Swepub:uu)stefblom
700a Branth, B4 aut
700a Johnsson, R4 aut
710a Department of Orthopaedics, St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden4 org
773t Spineg 23:10, s. 1124-1128, discussion 1129q 23:10<1124-1128, discussion 1129x 0362-2436x 1528-1159
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-53719

Hitta via bibliotek

  • Spine (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Tullberg, T
Blomberg, Stefan
Branth, B
Johnsson, R
Artiklar i publikationen
Spine
Av lärosätet
Uppsala universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy