SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-77605"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-77605" > The safety of reusi...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003240naa a2200385 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:uu-77605
003SwePub
008060504s1998 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-776052 URI
024a https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00032.x2 DOI
040 a (SwePub)uu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Blomström-Lundqvist, Carinau Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper4 aut0 (Swepub:uu)carinabl
2451 0a The safety of reusing ablation catheters with temperature control and the need for a validation protocol and guidelines for reprocessing
264 1b Wiley,c 1998
338 a print2 rdacarrier
520 a The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of reusing ablation catheters with temperature control, which has not previously been reported. A review of previously conducted studies on the feasibility of reusing electrode catheters is also presented. From September 1994 to December 1997, 74 deflectable ablation catheters with temperature control (Cordis-Websters and Osypkas) were used during mean 7.6 +/- 8.0 ablation sessions. The catheter tests included visual inspection for surface defects using a magnification glass, impedance measurements, evaluation of the catheter deflection capability, and the integrity of the thermistor and thermocouple. The catheters were sterilized by Sterrad after each use. A total of 41 catheters were rejected after an average 9.1 +/- 8.8 uses (range 1-31). The main reasons for rejection were inaccurate temperature measurements by the thermistor or thermocouple (19%), breakage of or defect in the internal pulling wire (12%), loss or disturbance of electrogram (9%), and loss of deflection capability (8%). The reuse of the catheters has not resulted in any major catheter failures or any major adverse clinical complications. There were no local or systemic infections. It can be concluded that these types of ablation catheters will sustain repeated uses and resterilizations without untoward harm to the patient provided that a thorough validation protocol and guidelines for quality control and rejection of catheters are used. There seems to be no rational for setting a limit for the number of reuses, since most failures occurred at any time of reuse.
653 a Catheter Ablation/adverse effects/*economics/*instrumentation
653 a Equipment Reuse
653 a Equipment Safety
653 a Evaluation Studies
653 a Humans
653 a Practice Guidelines
653 a Quality Control
653 a Reproducibility of Results
653 a MEDICINE
653 a MEDICIN
710a Uppsala universitetb Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper4 org
773t Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiologyd : Wileyg 21:12, s. 2563-2570q 21:12<2563-2570x 0147-8389x 1540-8159
856u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=9894646&dopt=Citation
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-77605
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00032.x

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Blomström-Lundqv ...
Artiklar i publikationen
Pacing and Clini ...
Av lärosätet
Uppsala universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy