SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-8420"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-8420" > Targeting Non-obvio...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003538nam a2200397 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:uu-8420
003SwePub
008080131s2008 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
020 a 9789155470753q print
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-84202 URI
040 a (SwePub)uu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a vet2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a dok2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Johansson, Lars Age,d 1951-u Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap4 aut0 (Swepub:uu)lajoh517
2451 0a Targeting Non-obvious Errors in Death Certificates
264 1a Uppsala :b Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis,c 2008
300 a 105 s.
338 a electronic2 rdacarrier
490a Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine,x 1651-6206 ;v 305
520 a Mortality statistics are much used although their accuracy is often questioned. Producers of mortality statistics check for errors in death certification but current methods only capture obvious mistakes. This thesis investigates whether non-obvious errors can be found by linking death certificates to hospital discharge data.Data: 69,818 deaths in Sweden 1995. Paper I: Analysing differences between the underlying cause of death from the death certificate (UC) and the main discharge condition from the patient’s last hospitalization (MDC). Paper II: Testing whether differences can be explained by ICD definitions of UC and MDC. Paper III: Surveying methods in 44 current studies on the accuracy of death certificates. Paper IV: Checking death certificates against case summaries for: i) 573 deaths where UC and MDC were the same or the difference could be explained; ii) 562 deaths where the difference could not be explained.Results: In 54% of deaths the MDC differed from the UC. Almost two-thirds of the differences were medically compatible since the MDC might have developed as a complication of the UC. Of 44 recent evaluation studies, only 8 describe the methods in such detail that the study could be replicated. Incompatibility between MDC and UC indicates a four-fold risk that the death certificate is inaccurate. For some diagnostic groups, however, death certificates are often inaccurate even when the UC and MDC are compatible.Conclusion: Producers of official mortality statistics could reduce the number of non-obvious errors in the statistics by collecting additional information on incompatible deaths and on deaths in high-risk diagnostic groups. ICD conventions contribute to the quality problem since they presuppose that all deaths are due to a single underlying cause. However, in an ageing population an increasing number of deaths are due to an accumulation of etiologically unrelated conditions.
653 a Social medicine
653 a Cause of death
653 a Death certificates
653 a Medical records
653 a Mortality statistics
653 a Quality control
653 a Medical record linkage
653 a Socialmedicin
700a Westerling, Ragnar4 ths
700a Jougla, Eric,c Directeuru INSERM, Le Vésinet4 opn
710a Uppsala universitetb Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap4 org
856u https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:171336/FULLTEXT01.pdfx primaryx Raw objecty fulltext
856u https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:171336/COVER01.pdfy cover
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8420

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy