SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/313329"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/313329" > Cell-free DNA scree...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00005755naa a2200937 4500
001oai:gup.ub.gu.se/313329
003SwePub
008240910s2022 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/3133292 URI
024a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.0192 DOI
040 a (SwePub)gu
041 a eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Dar, Pe'er4 aut
2451 0a Cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in pregnancies at low and high risk for aneuploidy with genetic confirmation
264 1b Elsevier BV,c 2022
520 a Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy (T) 21, 18, and 13 has been rapidly adopted into clinical practice. However, prior studies are limited by lack of follow up genetic testing to confirm outcomes and accurately assess test performance, particularly in women at low-risk for aneuploidy.To compare the performance of cfDNA screening for T21, T18 and T13 between women at low and high-risk for aneuploidy in a large, prospective cohort with genetic confirmation of results.A multicenter prospective observational study at 21 centers in 6 countries. Women who had SNP-based cfDNA screening for T21, T18 and T13 were enrolled. Genetic confirmation was obtained from prenatal or newborn DNA samples. Test performance and test failure (no-call) rates were assessed for the cohort and women with low and high prior risk for aneuploidy were compared. An updated cfDNA algorithm, blinded to pregnancy outcome, was also assessed.20,194 were enrolled at median gestational age of 12.6 weeks (IQR:11.6, 13.9). Genetic outcomes were confirmed in 17,851 (88.4%): 13,043 (73.1%) low-risk and 4,808 (26.9%) high-risk for aneuploidy. Overall, 133 trisomies were diagnosed (100 T21; 18 T18; 15 T13). cfDNA screen positive rate was lower in low- vs. high-risk (0.27% vs. 2.2%, p<0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity were similar between groups. The positive predictive value (PPV) for the low and high-risk groups was 85.7% vs. 97.5%, p=0.058 for T21; 50.0% vs. 81.3%, p=0.283 for T18; and 62.5% vs. 83.3, p=0.58 for T13, respectively. Overall, 602 (3.4%) patients had no-call result after the first draw and 287 (1.61%) after including cases with a second draw. Trisomy rate was higher in the 287 with no-call results than patients with a result on a first draw (2.8% vs. 0.7%, p=0.001). The updated algorithm showed similar sensitivity and specificity to the study algorhitm with a lower no-call rate.In women at low-risk for aneuploidy, SNP-based cfDNA has high sensitivity and specificity, PPV of 85.7% for T21 and 74.3% for the three common trisomies. Patients who receive a no-call result are at increased risk of aneuploidy and require additional investigation.
650 7a MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAPx Klinisk medicinx Reproduktionsmedicin och gynekologi0 (SwePub)302202 hsv//swe
650 7a MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCESx Clinical Medicinex Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine0 (SwePub)302202 hsv//eng
653 a Aneuploidy
653 a Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
653 a Chromosome Disorders
653 a diagnosis
653 a genetics
653 a Down Syndrome
653 a diagnosis
653 a genetics
653 a Female
653 a Humans
653 a Infant
653 a Newborn
653 a Nucleotides
653 a Pregnancy
653 a Pregnancy Outcome
653 a Prenatal Diagnosis
653 a methods
653 a Prospective Studies
653 a Trisomy
653 a diagnosis
653 a genetics
653 a Trisomy 13 Syndrome
653 a diagnosis
653 a genetics
653 a Trisomy 18 Syndrome
653 a diagnosis
653 a genetics
700a Jacobsson, Bo,d 1960u Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för obstetrik och gynekologi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology4 aut0 (Swepub:gu)xjacbo
700a MacPherson, Cora4 aut
700a Egbert, Melissa4 aut
700a Malone, Fergal4 aut
700a Wapner, Ronald J4 aut
700a Roman, Ashley S4 aut
700a Khalil, Asma4 aut
700a Faro, Revital4 aut
700a Madankumar, Rajeevi4 aut
700a Edwards, Lance4 aut
700a Haeri, Sina4 aut
700a Silver, Robert4 aut
700a Vohra, Nidhi4 aut
700a Hyett, Jon4 aut
700a Clunie, Garfield4 aut
700a Demko, Zachary4 aut
700a Martin, Kimberly4 aut
700a Rabinowitz, Matthew4 aut
700a Flood, Karen4 aut
700a Carlsson, Ylva,d 1975u Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Extern,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för obstetrik och gynekologi,External,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology4 aut0 (Swepub:gu)xcarly
700a Doulaveris, Georgios4 aut
700a Malone, Ciara4 aut
700a Hallingstrom, Maria4 aut
700a Klugman, Susan4 aut
700a Clifton, Rebecca4 aut
700a Kao, Charlly4 aut
700a Hakonarson, Hakon4 aut
700a Norton, Mary E4 aut
710a Göteborgs universitetb Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för obstetrik och gynekologi4 org
773t American journal of obstetrics and gynecologyd : Elsevier BVg 227:2q 227:2x 1097-6868x 0002-9378
856u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.019
8564 8u https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/313329
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.019

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy