Search: L773:1538 9588 OR L773:1538 957X
> (2020-2024) >
Repositioning forwa...
Repositioning forward-leaning passengers by seatbelt pre-pretensioning
-
- Mishra, Ekant (author)
- Autoliv AB, Sweden
-
- Mroz, K. (author)
- Autoliv AB, Sweden
-
- Lübbe, Nils, 1982 (author)
- Autoliv AB, Sweden,Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2023
- 2023
- English.
-
In: Traffic Injury Prevention. - 1538-957X .- 1538-9588. ; 24:8, s. 716-721
- Related links:
-
https://research.cha... (primary) (free)
-
show more...
-
https://research.cha...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Objective: The study determined the seatbelt pre-pretensioner force needed and the time required to reposition average male front-seat passengers from forward-leaning to upright using finite element simulations of the Active SAFER Human Body Model (Active SHBM). Methods: The Active SHBM was positioned in an initial forward-leaning position (29° forward from upright) on a deformable vehicle seat. A pre-pretensioner was modeled as a pre-loaded spring and its ability to reposition the forward-leaning Active SHBM to an upright position was simulated for twenty-four different pre-crash conditions. Four parameters were varied: (1) Automated Emergency Braking (AEB) active with 11 m/s2 or no AEB, (2) type of seatbelt system: Belt-In-Seat or B-pillar, (3) pre-pretensioner activation time (200 ms before, 100 ms before, or at the same time as AEB ramp-up), and (4) pre-pretensioner force (200 N, 300 N, 400 N, 600 N). The first thoracic vertebra fore-aft (T1 X) trajectories were compared against a reference upright position to determine the force and time needed to reposition and the effectiveness of repositioning in the different conditions. Results: The lowest force enabling repositioning in all simulations was 400 N (no AEB, Belt-In-Seat). It took about 350 ms. In the presence of AEB, activating the pre-pretensioner 200 ms before AEB and using 600 N pre-pretensioner force was needed for repositioning (taking 200 ms with Belt-In-Seat and 260 ms with B-pillar installations). Repositioning was faster and thus more effective with the Belt-In-Seat seatbelt in all simulations. Conclusions: All four parameters (presence of AEB, type of seatbelt system, pre-pretensioner activation time and force) affected the repositioning ability and time required. Far from all combinations repositioned a forward-leaning average male occupant model, but those found to be effective and fast appear as a feasible option for vehicle safety systems to reposition out-of-position occupants during pre-crash events.
Subject headings
- TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER -- Maskinteknik -- Annan maskinteknik (hsv//swe)
- ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY -- Mechanical Engineering -- Other Mechanical Engineering (hsv//eng)
- TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER -- Maskinteknik -- Farkostteknik (hsv//swe)
- ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY -- Mechanical Engineering -- Vehicle Engineering (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- motorized seatbelt
- out-of-position
- safety
- Human body model
- car occupant
Publication and Content Type
- art (subject category)
- ref (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database