SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Häggman Michael)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Häggman Michael) > Periprocedural outc...

Periprocedural outcome after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal tumors : A modified R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score adjusted comparison

Acosta Ruiz, Vanessa (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Radiologi
Ladjevardi, Sam (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Urologkirurgi
Brekkan, Einar (författare)
Uppsala University Hospital, Urology, Uppsala, Sweden
visa fler...
Häggman, Michael (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Urologkirurgi
Lönnemark, Maria (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Radiologi
Wernroth, Lisa (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Molekylär epidemiologi
Magnusson, Anders, 1947- (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Radiologi
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-06-17
2019
Engelska.
Ingår i: Acta Radiologica. - : Sage Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 60:2, s. 260-268
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: Comparable oncological outcomes have been seen after surgical nephrectomy and thermal ablation of renal tumors recently. However, periprocedural outcome needs to be assessed for aiding treatment decision.Purpose: To compare efficacy rates and periprocedural outcome (technical success, session time, hospitalization time, and complications) after renal tumor treatment with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).Material and Methods: The initial experience with 49 (treated with LPN) and 84 (treated with RFA) consecutive patients for a single renal tumor (diameter ≤ 5 cm, limited to the kidney) during 2007-2014 was evaluated. Patient and tumor characteristics, efficacy rates, and periprocedural outcome were collected retrospectively. The stratified Mantel Haenzel and Van Elteren tests, adjusted for tumor complexity (with the modified R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score [m-RNS]), were used to assess differences in treatment outcomes.Results: Primary efficacy rate was 98% for LPN and 85.7% for RFA; secondary efficacy rate was 93.9% for LPN and 95.2% for RFA; and technical success rate was 87.8% for LPN and 100% for RFA. Median session (m-RNS adjusted P < 0.001; LPN 215 min, RFA 137 min) and median hospitalization time were longer after LPN (m-RNS adjusted P < 0.001; LPN 5 days, RFA 2 days). Side effects were uncommon (LPN 2%, RFA 4.8%). Complications were more frequent after LPN (m-RNS adjusted P < 0.001; LPN 42.9%, RFA 10.7%).Conclusion: Both methods achieved equivalent secondary efficacy rates. RFA included several treatment sessions, but session and hospitalization times were shorter, and complications were less frequent than for LPN. The differences remained after adjustment for renal tumor complexity.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Urologi och njurmedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Urology and Nephrology (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Radiologi och bildbehandling (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Ablation procedures
interventional
kidney
percutaneous
primary neoplasms

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy