SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Zhou Hongwei)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Zhou Hongwei) > The efficacy of acc...

The efficacy of accommodative versus monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract patients A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhou, Hongwei (författare)
Zhu, Chongyan (författare)
Xu, Wenya (författare)
visa fler...
Zhou, Fang (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Statistiska institutionen,Capital University of Economics and Business, China
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018
2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: Medicine. - 0025-7974 .- 1536-5964. ; 97:40
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Introduction: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether accommodative intraocular lenses (AC-IOLs) are superior for cataract patients compared with monofocal IOLs (MF-IOLs). Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched through in August 2018 for AC-IOLs versus MF-IOLs in cataract patients. Studies were pooled under either fixed-effects model or random-effects model to calculate the relative risk (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), or standard mean difference (SMD) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) was chosen as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), pilocarpine-induced IOL shift, contrast sensitivity, and spectacle independence. Results: Seventeen studies, involving a total of 1764 eyes, were included. Our results revealed that AC-IOLs improved DCNVA (SMD=-1.84,95% CI=-2.56 to -1.11) and were associated with significantly greater anterior lens shift than MF-IOLs (WMD=-0.30, 95% CI=-0.37 to -0.23). Furthermore, spectacle independence was significantly better with AC-IOLs than with MF-IOLs (RR=3.07, 95% CI=1.06-8.89). However, there was no significant difference in CDVA and contrast sensitivity between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that AC-IOLs can provide cataract patients with DCNVA and result in more high levels of spectacle independence than MF-IOLs. Further studies with larger data set and well-designed models are required to validate our findings.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Oftalmologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Ophthalmology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

accommodative intraocular lenses
cataract
meta-analysis
monofocal intraocular lenses
systematic review

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

  • Medicine (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Zhou, Hongwei
Zhu, Chongyan
Xu, Wenya
Zhou, Fang
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Klinisk medicin
och Oftalmologi
Artiklar i publikationen
Medicine
Av lärosätet
Stockholms universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy