SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Milberg Per)
 

Search: WFRF:(Milberg Per) > (2015-2019) > Butterflies in Swed...

Butterflies in Swedish grasslands benefit from forest and respond to landscape composition at different spatial scales

Bergman, Karl-Olof (author)
Linköpings universitet,Biologi,Tekniska fakulteten
Daniel Ferreira, Juliana Daniel (author)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Linköpings universitet,Biologi,Tekniska fakulteten,Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Sweden,Institutionen för ekologi,Department of Ecology,Linköping University
Milberg, Per (author)
Linköpings universitet,Biologi,Tekniska fakulteten
show more...
Öckinger, Erik (author)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för ekologi,Department of Ecology,Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Sweden
Westerberg, Lars (author)
Linköpings universitet,Biologi,Tekniska fakulteten
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
 
2018-11-13
2018
English.
In: Landscape Ecology. - : SPRINGER. - 0921-2973 .- 1572-9761. ; 33:12, s. 2189-2204
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • ContextLoss and fragmentation of semi-natural grasslands has critically affected many butterfly species in Europe. Habitat area and isolation can have strong effects on the local biodiversity but species may also be strongly affected by the surrounding matrix.ObjectivesWe explored how different land cover types in the landscape explained the occurrence of butterfly species in semi-natural grasslands.MethodsUsing data from 476 semi-natural grasslands in Sweden, we analysed the effect of matrix composition on species richness and occurrence. Additionally, we analysed at which spatial scales butterflies responded to matrix types (forests, semi-natural grasslands, arable land and water).ResultsForest cover showed the strongest positive effect on species richness, followed by semi-natural grasslands. Forest also had a positive effect on red-listed species at local scales. Responses to matrix composition were highly species-specific. The majority of the 30most common species showed strong positive responses to the amount of forest cover within 200-500m. There was a smaller group of species showing a positive response to arable land cover within 500-2000m. Thirteen species showed positive responses to the amount of semi-natural grasslands, generally at larger scales (10-30km).ConclusionsOur study showed that surrounding forest is beneficial for many grassland butterfly species and that forests might mitigate the negative effects of habitat loss caused by agricultural intensification. Also, semi-natural grasslands were an important factor for species richness at larger spatial scales, indicating that a landscape consisting mainly of supporting habitats (i.e. forests) are insufficient to sustain a rich butterfly fauna.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi -- Ekologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences -- Ecology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Conservation; Forest; Grassland; Landscape composition; Lepidoptera; Spatial scale

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view