SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Jolles S.)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Jolles S.) > (2015-2019) > Current treatment o...

Current treatment options with immunoglobulin G for the individualization of care in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease

Jolles, S (författare)
Orange, JS (författare)
Gardulf, A (författare)
Karolinska Institutet
visa fler...
Stein, MR (författare)
Shapiro, R (författare)
Borte, M (författare)
Berger, M (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2015-01-02
2015
Engelska.
Ingår i: Clinical and experimental immunology. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1365-2249 .- 0009-9104. ; 179:2, s. 146-160
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Primary antibody deficiencies require lifelong replacement therapy with immunoglobulin (Ig)G to reduce the incidence and severity of infections. Both subcutaneous and intravenous routes of administering IgG can be effective and well tolerated. Treatment regimens can be individualized to provide optimal medical and quality-of-life outcomes in infants, children, adults and elderly people. Frequency, dose, route of administration, home or infusion-centre administration, and the use of self- or health-professional-administered infusion can be tailored to suit individual patient needs and circumstances. Patient education is needed to understand the disease and the importance of continuous therapy. Both the subcutaneous and intravenous routes have advantages and disadvantages, which should be considered in selecting each patient's treatment regimen. The subcutaneous route is attractive to many patients because of a reduced incidence of systemic adverse events, flexibility in scheduling and its comparative ease of administration, at home or in a clinic. Self-infusion regimens, however, require independence and self-reliance, good compliance on the part of the patient/parent and the confidence of the physician and the nurse. Intravenous administration in a clinic setting may be more appropriate in patients with reduced manual dexterity, reluctance to self-administer or a lack of self-reliance, and intravenous administration at home for those with good venous access who prefer less frequent treatments. Both therapy approaches have been demonstrated to provide protection from infections and improve health-related quality of life. Data supporting current options in IgG replacement are presented, and considerations in choosing between the two routes of therapy are discussed.

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy