SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

L773:2214 6296 OR L773:2214 6326
 

Search: L773:2214 6296 OR L773:2214 6326 > Who is marginalized...

Who is marginalized in energy justice? Amplifying community leader perspectives of energy transitions in Ghana

Baker, Erin (author)
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, United States
Nock, Destenie (author)
Engineering and Public Policy Department, Carnegie Mellon University, United States
Levin, Todd (author)
Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, United States
show more...
Atarah, Samuel A. (author)
School of Physical & Mathematical Sciences, University of Ghana, Ghana
Afful-Dadzie, Anthony (author)
Department of Operations Management and Information Systems, University of Ghana Business School, Ghana
Dodoo-Arhin, David (author)
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ghana School of Engineering Sciences, Ghana
Ndikumana, Léonce (author)
Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States
Shittu, Ekundayo (author)
Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Department, The George Washington University, United States
Muchapondwa, Edwin (author)
The School of Economics, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Sackey, Charles Van-Hein (author)
Engineering and Public Policy Department, Carnegie Mellon University, United States
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2021
2021
English.
In: Energy Research & Social Science. - : Elsevier. - 2214-6296 .- 2214-6326. ; 73
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • There is a divide in energy access studies, between technologically-focused modeling papers in engineering and economics, and energy justice frameworks and principles grounded in social sciences. Quantitative computational models are necessary when analyzing energy, and more specifically electricity, systems, as they are technologically-complex systems that can diverge from intuitive patterns. To assure energy justice, these models must be reflective of, and informative to, a wide range of stakeholders, including households and communities alongside utilities, governments, and others. Yet, moving from a qualitative understanding of preferences to quantitative modeling is challenging. In this perspective piece, we pilot the use of the value-focused thinking framework to inform stakeholder engagement. The result is a strategic objective hierarchy that highlights the tradeoffs and the social, economic and technological factors that need to be measured in models. We apply the process in Ghana, using a survey, stakeholder workshops, and follow-up interviews to uncover key tradeoffs and stakeholder-derived objectives. We discuss three key areas that have been rarely, if ever, well-represented in energy models: (1) the relationship between the dynamics of electricity end-use and the technology and economic structure of the system; (2) explicit tradeoffs between electricity access, cost, and reliability as defined by stakeholders; and (3) the definition of new objectives, such as minimizing hazards related to theft. We conclude that this model of engagement provides an opportunity to tie together rigorous qualitative analysis and stakeholder engagement with crucial quantitative models of the electricity system.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Nationalekonomi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business -- Economics (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view