WFRF:(Lindgren Joakim Dr 1971 )
Search: WFRF:(Lindgren Joakim Dr 1971 ) > Outcome-based accou...
- 8 of 40
- Previous record
- Next record
- To hitlist
- Högberg, BjörnUmeå universitet,Institutionen för socialt arbete (author)
Outcome-based accountability regimes in OECD countries : a global policy model?
- Article/chapterEnglish2021
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
- 2020-12-01
- Routledge,2021
- electronicrdacarrier
Numbers
- LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-177386
- https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-177386URI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1849614DOI
Supplementary language notes
- Language:English
- Summary in:English &Chinese
Part of subdatabase
- SwePubSwePub
Classification
Notes
- Alternative title: 经合组织国家中结果导向的问责制度：一种全球政策模式
- The global diffusion of outcome-based accountability in education is contested, with accounts of universal convergence being challenged by perspectives emphasising heterogeneity across different national or local contexts. This study uses data from PISA to explore, firstly, the spatial and temporal diffusion of accountability across OECD countries, and secondly, whether accountability is implemented as a single coherent regime. Using cluster analysis techniques, we find that most countries fall into a ‘Thick’ accountability regime, with widespread use of most forms of accountability tools. However, this regime is not fully coherent, with some countries relying more on horizontal, and others on vertical, forms of accountability. A sizeable minority of countries fall into a ‘Thin’ regime, in which most accountability tools are largely absent. We also find indications of convergence across countries over time. We conclude that while accountability in education is indeed widespread, and increasingly so, it is not a universally dominant regime.
- 经合组织国家中结果导向的问责制度：一种全球政策模式？结果导向的教育问责制在全球范围内的扩散备受争议，其有关趋同化的论述被强调国家或地区间多样性的观点所挑战。本研究利用国际学生能力测试（PISA）的数据，首先从空间和时间维度探究问责制在经合组织国家教育系统中的扩散情况; 其次探讨问责制是否作为一项单独、统一的机制来实施。利用聚类分析方法，我们发现大多数国家属于“厚”问责机制，即广泛应用多种形式的问责手段。但该机制并未呈现统一形态，有些国家更多依赖横向形式的问责制，而其他则倾向于纵向形式的问责制。一小部分国家属于“薄”问责机制，即缺乏大部分的问责手段。我们也发现，随着时间的推移，各国表现出趋同的迹象。我们的结论是，尽管教育中的问责制广泛存在，且日益普及，但并非一种普遍主导的机制。我们的结论是，尽管教育中的问责制广泛存在，且日益普及，但并非是一种普遍主导的机制。
Subject headings and genre
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP Utbildningsvetenskap hsv//swe
- SOCIAL SCIENCES Educational Sciences hsv//eng
- Accountability
- outcomebased accountability
- PISA
- education policy
- policy diffusion
- comparative education
- cluster analysis
- regimes
- 问责
- 结果导向的问责
- 国 际学生能力测试
- 教育政 策
- 政策扩散
- 比较教育
- 聚 类分析
- 机制
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
- Lindgren, Joakim,Dr,1971-Umeå universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad utbildningsvetenskap(Swepub:umu)joli0003 (author)
- Umeå universitetInstitutionen för socialt arbete (creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
- In:Comparative Education: Routledge57:3, s. 301-3210305-00681360-0486
Internet link
Find in a library
- Comparative Education (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)
To the university's database
- 8 of 40
- Previous record
- Next record
- To hitlist
Find more in SwePub
- By the author/editor
- Högberg, Björn
- Lindgren, Joakim ...
- About the subject
-
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
- and Educational Scie ...
- Articles in the publication
- Comparative Educ ...
- By the university
- Umeå University
Search outside SwePub
- Extend your search to:
- Google Book Search
- Google Scholar
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
- Copyright © LIBRIS - National Library Systems
- LIBRIS.kb.se
