SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Pogue Jamie R.)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Pogue Jamie R.) > Virtual reality exp...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003196naa a2200457 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:su-164064
003SwePub
008190111s2019 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
0247 a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-1640642 URI
0247 a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.0032 DOI
040 a (SwePub)su
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
1001 a Carl, Emily4 aut
2451 0a Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders :b A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
264 1b Elsevier BV,c 2019
338 a print2 rdacarrier
520 a Trials of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for anxiety-related disorders have proliferated in number and diversity since our previous meta-analysis that examined 13 total trials, most of which were for specific phobias (Powers & Emmelkamp, 2008). Since then, new trials have compared VRET to more diverse anxiety and related disorders including social anxiety disorder (SAD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and panic disorder (PD) with and without agoraphobia. With the availability of this data, it is imperative to re-examine the efficacy of VRET for anxiety. A literature search for randomized controlled trials of VRET versus control or in vivo exposure yielded 30 studies with 1057 participants. Fourteen studies tested VRET for specific phobias, 8 for SAD or performance anxiety, 5 for PTSD, and 3 for PD. A random effects analysis estimated a large effect size for VRET versus waitlist (g = 0.90) and a medium to large effect size for VRET versus psychological placebo conditions (g = 0.78). A comparison of VRET and in vivo conditions did not show significantly different effect sizes (g = −0.07). These findings were relatively consistent across disorders. A meta-regression analysis revealed that larger sample sizes were associated with lower effect sizes in VRET versus control comparisons (β = −0.007, p <  0.05). These results indicate that VRET is an effective and equal medium for exposure therapy.
650 7a SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAPx Psykologi0 (SwePub)5012 hsv//swe
650 7a SOCIAL SCIENCESx Psychology0 (SwePub)5012 hsv//eng
653 a meta-analysis
653 a virtual reality
653 a VR
653 a virtual reality exposure therapy
653 a VRET
653 a Psychology
653 a psykologi
7001 a Stein, Aliza T.4 aut
7001 a Levihn-Coon, Andrew4 aut
7001 a Pogue, Jamie R.4 aut
7001 a Rothbaum, Barbara4 aut
7001 a Emmelkamp, Paul4 aut
7001 a Asmundson, Gordon J. G.4 aut
7001 a Carlbring, Peru Stockholms universitet,Klinisk psykologi,University of Southern Denmark, Denmark4 aut0 (Swepub:su)pecar
7001 a Powers, Mark B.4 aut
7102 a Stockholms universitetb Klinisk psykologi4 org
7730 t Journal of Anxiety Disordersd : Elsevier BVg 61, s. 27-36q 61<27-36x 0887-6185x 1873-7897
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-164064
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy