SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Wallerstedt Sven)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Wallerstedt Sven) > The specialty clini...

The specialty clinical pharmacology needs to be examined separately to guarantee a sufficient level of knowledge in medical students

Wallerstedt, Susanna Maria, 1970 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för farmakologi,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Pharmacology,University of Gothenburg
Wallerstedt, Mattias P. (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för matematiska vetenskaper,Department of Mathematical Sciences
Wallerstedt, Sven, 1944 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för medicin,Institute of Medicine,University of Gothenburg
 (creator_code:org_t)
2012-12-19
2013
Engelska.
Ingår i: European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0031-6970 .- 1432-1041. ; 69:6, s. 1331-1334
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Purpose In medical schools small specialties like clinical pharmacology may be integrated in courses covering larger specialties and examined concomitantly. The results of a pilot study suggested that this approach would have negative consequences on the knowledge gained in clinical pharmacology with integration of this speciality in the course of internal medicine and concomitant examination. The aim of the present study was to assess in more detail whether students’ presumed tendency to study selectively influences approval (the pass mark), a surrogate marker of the knowledge gained. Methods A written examination for the integrated course in clinical pharmacology and internal medicine in Gothenburg, Sweden, was specifically designed in 2008 to evaluate the research question. The examination consisted of 50 short answer questions, of which five focused on clinical pharmacology (maximum score 10) and 45 were on internal medicine (maximum score 90). The cut-off level for approval (pass mark) was 60 %. Results Of the 81 students who wrote the examination, 73 (90.1 %) passed the examination as a whole. When the questions in clinical pharmacology were assessed separately, 62 (76.5 %) students passed the cut-off level of 60 %; the corresponding proportion of students achieving the cut-off level for questions on internal medicine was 90.1 %. There was a significant correlation between the results of the two specialties (p<0.001), but the questions on clinical pharmacology generated lower scores (p<0.001). The correlation coefficient between the results of two randomly chosen questions for clinical pharmacology was greater than that of two randomly chosen questions in internal medicine (p<0.001). Conclusions Our results confirm that a small specialty like clinical pharmacology may need to be examined separately in order to guarantee a sufficient level of knowledge among students.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Farmakologi och toxikologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Pharmacology and Toxicology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Clinical pharmacology
Device approval
Educational measurement
Internal medicine
informal curriculum
Internal medicine

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy