Sökning: L773:1092 4388 OR L773:1558 9102 >
Task Difficulty Dif...
-
Zekveld, Adriana ALinköpings universitet,Institutet för handikappvetenskap (IHV),Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande,Filosofiska fakulteten,Vrije University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
(författare)
Task Difficulty Differentially Affects Two Measures of Processing Load: The Pupil Response During Sentence Processing and Delayed Cued Recall of the Sentences
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2013
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association,2013
-
printrdacarrier
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:liu-102989
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-102989URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0058)DOI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
Anmärkningar
-
Funding Agencies|Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research|Veni 451-10-031|
-
Purpose: In this study, the authors assessed the influence of masking level (29% or 71% sentence perception) and test modality on the processing load during language perception as reflected by the pupil response. In addition, the authors administered a delayed cued stimulus recall test to examine whether processing load affected the encoding of the stimuli in memory. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethod: Participants performed speech and text reception threshold tests, during which the pupil response was measured. In the cued recall test, the first half of correctly perceived sentences was presented, and participants were asked to complete the sentences. Reading and listening span tests of working memory capacity were presented as well. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults: Regardless of test modality, the pupil response indicated higher processing load in the 29% condition than in the 71% correct condition. Cued recall was better for the 29% condition. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions: The consistent effect of masking level on the pupil response during listening and reading support the validity of the pupil response as a measure of processing load during language perception. The absent relation between pupil response and cued recall may suggest that cued recall is not directly related to processing load, as reflected by the pupil response.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
-
speech recognition
-
speech recall
-
pupil response
-
processing load
-
text reception threshold (TRT)
-
SOCIAL SCIENCES
-
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Festen, Joost MVrije University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
(författare)
-
Kramer, Sophia EVrije University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
(författare)
-
Linköpings universitetInstitutet för handikappvetenskap (IHV)
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association56:4, s. 1156-11651092-43881558-9102
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas