When matching fails: Understanding the process of matching pain-disability treatment to risk profile

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Search: WFRF:(Linton Steven 1952 ) > When matching fails :

Details
MARC

Bergbom, Sofia,1982-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete (author)

When matching fails : Understanding the process of matching pain-disability treatment to risk profile

BookEnglish

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

printrdacarrier

Numbers

LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:oru-35184
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-35184URI

Supplementary language notes

Language:English
Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

SwePubSwePub

Classification

Subject category:vet swepub-contenttype
Subject category:ovr swepub-publicationtype

Notes

This research was supported by grants from the Swedish Council for Working Lifeand Social Research
Purpose A previous study [1] showed that matching people at risk for pain-related disability to an intervention aimed at targeting their psychological problem profile did not, as hypothesized, improve the effect of the intervention. Methodological issues were suggested to explain the lack of differential effect. It was questioned whether the profiles used to allocate people to treatment were adequate. The aim of this study was to investigate if the risk profiles used to determine matching were sufficiently stable and valid by comparing the original profiles withprofiles constructed using other methods.Methods Ninety-five people suffering musculoskeletal problems were screened, profiled, and matched to workplace based early interventions according to profiles. We studied stability and validity of their psychological risk profiles by investigating their concordance at different time points. People were originally assigned to profiles at inclusion, using a brief screening questionnaire. Then, they were profiled just before treatment start,using the same items. Finally, they were profiled again at treatment start, using extensive questionnaires. Concordance among the three sets of profiles was investigated.Results Profiles at inclusion were unstable until treatment start. People moved from profiles with more severe elevations in psychological variables, to a profile with moderate elevations. Concordance between the two means of profiling at treatment start was better; the brief screening and the extensive questionnaires assigned people to similar profiles.Conclusions Risk level may be determined with brief instruments at an early stage of problem development. However, profiles and targets for interventions should be determined immediately prior to treatment start, preferably using full questionnaires.

Subject headings and genre

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP Psykologi hsv//swe
SOCIAL SCIENCES Psychology hsv//eng
Musculoskeletal pain
Occupational Health Services
Disability leave
Risk Assessment
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Psykologi
Psychology

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

Boersma, Katja,1973-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete(Swepub:oru)kba (author)
Linton, Steven J.,1952-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete(Swepub:oru)svln (author)
Örebro universitetInstitutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete (creator_code:org_t)

Internet link

https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-35184

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor: Bergbom, Sofia, ...; Boersma, Katja, ...; Linton, Steven J ...

About the subject

SOCIAL SCIENCES: SOCIAL SCIENCES; and Psychology

By the university: Örebro University

Search outside SwePub

Extend your search to:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se