Sökning: WFRF:(Collet P.) > Usage Scenarios for...
Fältnamn | Indikatorer | Metadata |
---|---|---|
000 | 02954naa a2200337 4500 | |
001 | oai:gup.ub.gu.se/293428 | |
003 | SwePub | |
008 | 240910s2020 | |||||||||||000 ||eng| | |
024 | 7 | a https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/2934282 URI |
024 | 7 | a https://doi.org/10.1145/3307630.33424032 DOI |
040 | a (SwePub)gu | |
041 | a eng | |
042 | 9 SwePub | |
072 | 7 | a ref2 swepub-contenttype |
072 | 7 | a kon2 swepub-publicationtype |
100 | 1 | a Berger, Thorsten,d 1981u Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik (GU),Department of Computer Science and Engineering (GU)4 aut0 (Swepub:gu)xbethk |
245 | 1 0 | a Usage Scenarios for a Common Feature Modeling Language |
264 | c 2019-09-09 | |
264 | 1 | a New York, NY, USA :b ACM,c 2020 |
520 | a Feature models are recognized as a de facto standard for variability modeling. Presented almost three decades ago, dozens of different variations and extensions to the original feature-modeling notation have been proposed, together with hundreds of variability management techniques building upon feature models. Unfortunately, despite several attempts to establish a unified language, there is still no emerging consensus on a feature-modeling language that is both intuitive and simple, but also expressive enough to cover a range of important usage scenarios. There is not even a documented and commonly agreed set of such scenarios. Following an initiative among product-line engineering researchers in September 2018, we present 14 usage scenarios together with examples and requirements detailing each scenario. The scenario descriptions are the result of a systematic process, where members of the initiative authored original descriptions, which received feedback via a survey, and which we then refined and extended based on the survey results, reviewers' comments, and our own expertise. We also report the relevance of supporting each usage scenario for the language, as perceived by the initiative's members, prioritizing each scenario. We present a roadmap to build and implement a first version of the envisaged common language. | |
650 | 7 | a NATURVETENSKAPx Data- och informationsvetenskapx Programvaruteknik0 (SwePub)102052 hsv//swe |
650 | 7 | a NATURAL SCIENCESx Computer and Information Sciencesx Software Engineering0 (SwePub)102052 hsv//eng |
653 | a software product lines | |
653 | a feature models | |
653 | a unified language | |
700 | 1 | a Collet, P.4 aut |
710 | 2 | a Göteborgs universitetb Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik (GU)4 org |
773 | 0 | t SPLC '19: Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B. pp. 174–181d New York, NY, USA : ACMz 9781450366687 |
856 | 4 | u https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02342733/file/modevar19.pdf |
856 | 4 8 | u https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/293428 |
856 | 4 8 | u https://doi.org/10.1145/3307630.3342403 |
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy