WFRF:(Enlund Mats)
Sökning: WFRF:(Enlund Mats) > Is It Definitely Cl...
- 28 av 58
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
Is It Definitely Clear That Long-Term Survival after Breast Cancer Surgery Is Not Affected by Anaesthetics?
-
- Enlund, Mats (författare)
- Uppsala universitet,Centrum för klinisk forskning, Västerås
- (creator_code:org_t)
- 2021-07-06
- 2021
- Engelska.
- Ingår i: Cancers. - : MDPI. - 2072-6694. ; 13:14
- Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Retrospective studies indicate that cancer survival may be affected by the anaesthetic technique. Propofol seems to be a better choice than volatile anaesthetics, such as sevoflurane. The first two retrospective studies suggested better long-term survival with propofol, but not for breast cancer. Subsequent retrospective studies from Asia indicated the same. When data from seven Swedish hospitals were analysed, including 6305 breast cancer patients, different analyses gave different results, from a non-significant difference in survival to a remarkably large difference in favour of propofol, an illustration of the innate weakness in the retrospective design. The largest randomised clinical trial, registered on clinicaltrial.gov, with survival as an outcome is the Cancer and Anesthesia study. Patients are here randomised to propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion of patients with breast cancer was completed in autumn 2017. Delayed by the pandemic, one-year survival data for the cohort were presented in November 2020. Due to the extremely good short-term survival for breast cancer, one-year survival is of less interest for this disease. As the inclusions took almost five years, there was also a trend to observe. Unsurprisingly, no difference was found in one-year survival between the two groups, and the trend indicated no difference either.Simple summaryThe choice of anaesthetic may affect long-term survival, as suggested in animal studies and in retrospective patient studies. Breast cancer seems to be an exception, according to results from retrospective patient studies. So far this has not been proven in randomised clinical trials. The current state of research is summarised in this overview. The conclusion is that today it seems that the choice of anaesthetic does not play a role in long-term survival after breast cancer surgery.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Anestesi och intensivvård (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- anaesthesia
- breast cancer
- propofol
- volatile anaesthetics
- survival analysis
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- for (ämneskategori)
- 28 av 58
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
Hitta mer i SwePub
- Av författaren/redakt...
- Enlund, Mats
- Om ämnet
-
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
- och Klinisk medicin
- och Cancer och onkol ...
-
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
- och Klinisk medicin
- och Anestesi och int ...
- Artiklar i publikationen
- Cancers
- Av lärosätet
- Uppsala universitet
Sök utanför SwePub
- Sök vidare i:
- Google Book Search
- Google Scholar
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
- Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem
- LIBRIS.kb.se
