SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Wärmländer Sebastian K T S)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Wärmländer Sebastian K T S) > (2015-2019) > Landmark Typology i...

Landmark Typology in Applied Morphometrics Studies : What's the Point?

Wärmländer, Sebastian K. T. S. (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Stockholms universitet,Institutionen för biokemi och biofysik,UCLA, California; Linköping University, Sweden,Affärsrätt,Filosofiska fakulteten,Stockholm Univ, Sweden; UCLA, CA USA
Garvin, Heather (författare)
Des Moines Univ, IA USA
Guyomarc'h, Pierre (författare)
Univ Bordeaux, France
visa fler...
Petaros, Anja (författare)
Natl Board Forens Med, Dept Forens Med, Artillerigatan 12, S-58758 Linkoping, Sweden
Sholts, Sabrina B. (författare)
Smithsonian Inst, DC 20560 USA
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-11-28
2019
Engelska.
Ingår i: Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology. - : Wiley. - 1932-8486. ; 302:7, s. 1144-1153
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Landmarks are the hallmark of biological shape analysis as discrete anatomical points of correspondence. Various systems have been developed for their classification. In the most widely used system, developed by Bookstein in the 1990s, landmarks are divided into three distinct types based on their anatomical locations and biological significance. As Bookstein and others have argued that different landmark types possess different qualities, e.g., that Type 3 landmarks contain deficient information about shape variation and are less reliably measured, researchers began using landmark types as justification for selecting or avoiding particular landmarks for measurement or analysis. Here, we demonstrate considerable variation in landmark classifications among 17 studies using geometric morphometrics (GM), due to disagreement in the application of both Bookstein's landmark typology and individual landmark definitions. A review of the literature furthermore shows little correlation between landmark type and measurement reproducibility, especially when factors such as differences in measurement tools (calipers, digitizer, or computer software) and data sources (dry crania, 3D models, or 2D images) are considered. Although landmark typology is valuable when teaching biological shape analysis, we find that employing it in research design introduces confusion without providing useful information. Instead, researchers should choose landmark configurations based on their ability to test specific research hypotheses, and research papers should include justifications of landmark choices along with landmark definitions, details on landmark collection methods, and appropriate interobserver and intraobserver analyses. Hence, while the landmarks themselves are crucial for GM, we argue that their typology is of little use in applied studies. Anat Rec, 302:1144-1153, 2019. 

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap -- Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik med samhällsvetenskaplig inriktning (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Media and Communications -- Information Systems, Social aspects (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Bookstein
craniometrics
measurement precision
shape analysis
landmark classification

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy