SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Bigliardi Stefano)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Bigliardi Stefano) > Barbour's Typologie...

Barbour's Typologies and the Contemporary Debate on Islam and Science

Bigliardi, Stefano (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Centrum för Mellanösternstudier (CMES),Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar,Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten,Centre for Advanced Middle Eastern Studies (CMES),Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences,Faculty of Social Sciences
 (creator_code:org_t)
2012-08-23
2012
Engelska.
Ingår i: Zygon. - : Wiley. - 0591-2385. ; 47:3, s. 501-519
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Despite various criticisms, Ian Barbour's fourfold classification of the possible relationships between religion and science remains influential. I compare Barbour's taxonomy with the theories of four authors who, in the last four decades, have addressed the relationship between science and religion from a Muslim perspective. The aim of my analysis is twofold. First, I offer a comparative perspective to the debate on science and Islam. Second, following Barbour's suggestion, I test the general applicability of his categories by comparing them with a discourse on science and religion that is not focused on Christianity. In the first section, I reconstruct Barbour's typologies, recalling some major objections to them, and arguing why despite the latter, Barbour's model is employed for the present analysis. I also reconstruct Barbour's parallel model for the relationships between different religions. In the second section, I reconstruct the discourse on science and religion developed by the Palestinian-American scholar Ismail Raji al-Faruqi. The third section is devoted to the ideas of the Persian-American scholar Seyyed Hossein Nasr. In the fourth section, I examine the views of the Iranian author Mehdi Golshani. The fifth section reconstructs the theories of the Algerian author Nidhal Guessoum. In the final section, I argue that a generalized use of the integration concept to refer to the entire debate on Islam and science is unhelpful. While these positions do not appear to instantiate Barbourian integration of science and religion, they do move toward what Barbour (skeptically) describes as integration between religions.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Ismail Raji al-Faruqi
Ian Barbour
Mehdi Golshani
Nidhal Guessoum
integration
Islam and science
Seyyed Hossein Nasr

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

  • Zygon (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Bigliardi, Stefa ...
Om ämnet
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Annan samhällsve ...
Artiklar i publikationen
Zygon
Av lärosätet
Lunds universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy