SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(von Essen Erica)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(von Essen Erica) > How fences communic...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003045naa a2200373 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:su-223774
003SwePub
008231115s2023 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-2237742 URI
024a https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.011462 DOI
040 a (SwePub)su
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a von Essen, Erica,d 1987-u Stockholms universitet,Socialantropologiska institutionen,Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway4 aut0 (Swepub:su)ervo0366
2451 0a How fences communicate interspecies codes of conduct in the landscape :b toward bidirectional communication?
264 c 2023
264 1c 2023
338 a print2 rdacarrier
520 a The fence provides two functions in wildlife management. First, it physically blocks, deters or impedes wild animals from access to protected areas or resources. Second, the fence signals impassability, danger, pain or irritation to animals through both of these pathways: the actual blockade and the signal of no access both communicates to wild animals that they should stay away, producing area effects which constrain animal mobility. The mere presence of a fence, while imperfect and potentially passable, can come to establish an area effect of avoidance. In this regard, fences are part of an interspecies communication on the basis of mutually understood signals in the landscape. In this paper, we consider how fences, both physical, such as walls, and virtual, such as 'biofences' that use sensory deterrents, signal danger or no access to wildlife, and with what practical and conceptual limitations. Through a framework of ecosemiotics, the communication of signals between wildlife and humans, we discuss the communicative role fences play in human-wildlife interactions. First, we outline the way in which ecosemiotics may be leveraged to manage human-wildlife conflicts by utilizing fences as signals. Then we explain miscommunication, and how this impacts the success of fences. Finally, we discuss the normative problems of attempting to signal to wildlife how to behave and where to be, and raise the need for bidirectional communication across species, such that wild animals are also seen as participants in negotiating space and access around humans.
650 7a NATURVETENSKAPx Biologi0 (SwePub)1062 hsv//swe
650 7a NATURAL SCIENCESx Biological Sciences0 (SwePub)1062 hsv//eng
653 a fence
653 a semiotics
653 a sensory ecology
653 a wildlife management
700a Drenthen, Martin4 aut
700a Bhardwaj, Manisha4 aut
710a Stockholms universitetb Socialantropologiska institutionen4 org
773t Wildlife Biologyx 0909-6396x 1903-220X
856u https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01146y Fulltext
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-223774
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01146

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
von Essen, Erica ...
Drenthen, Martin
Bhardwaj, Manish ...
Om ämnet
NATURVETENSKAP
NATURVETENSKAP
och Biologi
Artiklar i publikationen
Wildlife Biology
Av lärosätet
Stockholms universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy