SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(van Vliet L.)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(van Vliet L.) > Good versus bad new...

Good versus bad news consultations in advanced breast cancer: the role of empathy in information recall – an observational study

van Vliet, Liesbeth M (författare)
Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Leeuwenburgh, Margot L R (författare)
Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Westendorp, Janine (författare)
Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
visa fler...
van Dulmen, Sandra (författare)
Department of Communication, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands, Institute for Healh Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
de Jong, Paul C (författare)
Department of Medical Oncology, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
Stouthard, Jacqueline M L (författare)
Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2023-03-27
2024
Engelska.
Ingår i: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368. ; 14, s. e528-e532
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objective We explored, in advanced breast cancer, whether: (1) patients recall less information following bad versus good news consultations; (2) empathy has a greater effect on recalled information following bad versus good news consultations.Methods Observational study using audio-recorded consultations. Participants’ recall of provided information about treatment options, aims/positive effects and side-effects was assessed. Clinician-expressed empathy and consultation type were determined. Regression analyses assessed associations between consultation type and recall, exploring moderating influences of clinician-expressed empathy.ResultsFor 41 consultations (18 bad news, 23 good news), recall data were completed; total recall (47% vs 73%, p=0.03) and recall about treatment options (67% vs 85%, p=0.08, trend) were significantly worse following bad news compared with good news consultations. Recall about treatment aims/positive effects (53% vs 70%, p=0.30) and side-effects (28% vs 49%, p=0.20) was not significantly worse following bad news. Empathy moderated the relationship between consultation type and total recall (p<0.01), recall about treatment options (p=0.03) and about aims/positive effects (p<0.01) but not about side-effects (p=0.10). Only following good news consultations empathy influenced recall favourably.Conclusions This explorative study suggests that in advanced cancer, information recall is especially impaired following bad news consultations, for which empathy does not improve remembered information.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Människan i vården
The Human Perspective in Care

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy