SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Lindh U)
 

Search: WFRF:(Lindh U) > Predicting suicide:...

Predicting suicide: A comparison between clinical suicide risk assessment and the Suicide Intent Scale

Lindh, A. U. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Beckman, K. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Carlborg, A. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
show more...
Waern, Margda, 1955 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för psykiatri och neurokemi,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry
Salander Renberg, Ellinor (author)
Umeå universitet,Psykiatri
Dahlin, M. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Runeson, B. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2020
2020
English.
In: Journal of Affective Disorders. - : Elsevier BV. - 0165-0327 .- 1573-2517. ; 263, s. 445-449
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: How suicide risk should be assessed is under discussion with arguments for both actuarial and clinical approaches. The aim of the present study was to compare the predictive accuracy of a clinical suicide risk assessment to that of the Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) in predicting suicide within one year of an episode of self-harm with or without suicidal intent. Methods: Prospective clinical study of 479 persons assessed in a psychiatric emergency department after an episode of self-harm. The clinical risk assessment and the SIS rating were made independently of each other. Suicides within one year were identified in the National Cause of Death Register. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, optimal cut-offs were identified and accuracy statistics were calculated. Results: Of 479 participants, 329 (68.7%) were women. The age range was 18-95 years. During one-year follow up, 14 participants died by suicide. The area under the curve (AUC) for the clinical risk assessment and the SIS score were very similar, as were the accuracy statistic measures at the optimal cut-offs of the respective methods. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each assessment method was 6%. Limitations: The clinical suicide risk assessment is not standardized. The number of suicides is small, not allowing for stratification by e.g. gender or diagnosis. Conclusion: Predictive accuracy was similar for a clinical risk assessment and the SIS, and insufficient to guide treatment allocation.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Psykiatri (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Psychiatry (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Neurovetenskaper (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Neurosciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Self-harm
Suicide attempt
Suicide
Suicide risk assessment
Suicide
Intent Scale
self-harm
Neurosciences & Neurology
Psychiatry
Self-harm

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view