SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Soares J.)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Soares J.) > (2015-2019) > Interobserver agree...

Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions

Soares, J. B. (författare)
Iglesias-Garcia, J. (författare)
Goncalves, B. (författare)
visa fler...
Lindkvist, Björn (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för medicin,Institute of Medicine
Larino-Noia, José (författare)
Bastos, P. (författare)
Caetano, A. C. (författare)
Ferreira, A. (författare)
Pimentel-Nunes, P. (författare)
Lopes, L. (författare)
Moutinho-Ribeiro, P. (författare)
Dominguez-Munoz, J. E. (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Medknow, 2015
2015
Engelska.
Ingår i: Endoscopic Ultrasound. - : Medknow. - 2303-9027. ; 4:3, s. 244-249
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background and Objectives: Previous reports assessing the reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-E) in evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL) involved only experienced endosonographers. We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement (IOA) of EUS-E in the evaluation of SPL by endoscopists with different levels of experience in EUS and EUS-E. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational multicenter study was designed and included 11 endoscopists who were divided into four groups: Group A (long experience in EUS and EUS-E); Group B (short experience in EUS and EUS-E); Group C (long experience in EUS and no experience in EUS-E); and Group D (no experience in EUS or EUS-E). The observers independently classified the patterns of 60 video sequences of EUS-E, after a 20-min training session. For each group, we calculated IOA (kappa statistic, k) of EUS-E and the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-E for pancreatic malignancy, by comparing the pattern of EUS-E indicative of malignancy (heterogeneous or homogenous blue) with the final diagnosis. Results: The overall IOA was moderate (k = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.52). The IOA of Group A (k = 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-1.00) was significantly higher than that of Groups B (k = 0.54; 95% CI 0.40-0.71), C (k = 0.54; 95% CI 0.39-0.68), and D (k = 0.28; 95% CI 0.14-0.40). IOA of Groups B and C was not significantly different, but it was significantly higher than that of Group D. The diagnostic accuracy of Group A (area under the curve under summary receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) = 0.83; 95% CI 0.75-0.90) was not significantly different from that of Group B (AUROC = 0.77; 95% CI 0.71-0.83), but it was significantly higher than that of Groups C (AUROC = 0.74; 95% CI 0.67-0.81) and D (AUROC = 0.74; 95% CI 0.67-0.81). No significant difference was seen between Groups B, C, and D for diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: EUS-E is reproducible in the evaluation of SPL, even between endoscopists with no or limited experience in EUS and/or EUS-E. Reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy increase with experience in EUS and EUS-E.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Gastroenterologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Gastroenterology and Hepatology (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Hematologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Hematology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Diagnostic accuracy
endoscopic ultrasound elastography
interobserver agreement
reproducibility
ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY
DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS
GUIDED FNA
MASSES
METAANALYSIS
MULTICENTER
CANCER
BIOPSY
BREAST
Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy