SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hb-25940"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hb-25940" > Lung cancer researc...

Lung cancer research and its citation on clinical practice guidelines

Pallari, E. (författare)
University College London, MRC Clinical Trials and Methodology Unit, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
Eriksson, M. (författare)
Minso Solutions AB, Sven Eriksonsplatsen 4, Boras, 503 38, Sweden
Billhult, Annika (författare)
Högskolan i Borås,Akademin för vård, arbetsliv och välfärd,King's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
visa fler...
Billhult, T. (författare)
Minso Solutions AB, Sven Eriksonsplatsen 4, Boras, 503 38, Sweden
Aggarwal, A. (författare)
King's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
Lewison, G. (författare)
King's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
Sullivan, R. (författare)
King's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 2021
2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: Lung Cancer. - : Elsevier Ireland Ltd. - 0169-5002 .- 1872-8332. ; 154, s. 44-50
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: The impact of medical research is usually judged on the basis of citations in the serial literature. A better test of its utility is through its contribution to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat illness. This study aimed to compare the parameters of lung cancer research papers with those cited as references in lung cancer CPGs from 16 countries, and the Cochrane Collaboration. These comparisons were mainly based on bibliographic data compiled from the Web of Science (WoS).Methodology: We examined 7357 references (of which 4491 were unique) cited in a total of 77 lung cancer CPGs, and compared them with 73,214 lung cancer papers published in the WoS between 2004 and 2018.Results: References used by lung CPGs were much more clinical than the overall body of research papers on this cancer, and their authors predominantly came from smaller northern European countries. However, the leading institutions whose papers were cited the most on these CPGs were from the USA, notably the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. The types of research cited by the CPGs were primarily clinical trials, as well as three treatment modalities (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery). Genetics, palliative care and quality of life were largely neglected. The median time gap between papers cited on a lung CPG and its publication was 3.5 years longer than for WoS citations.Conclusions: Analysis of the references on CPGs allows an alternative means of research evaluation, and one that may be more appropriate for clinical research than citations in academic journals. Own-country references show the direct contribution of research to a country's health care, and other-country references show the esteem in which this research has been held internationally. © 2021 King's College London

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap -- Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Media and Communications -- Information Studies (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Altmetrics
Clinical impact
Clinical practice guidelines
Countries
Institutions
Lung cancer
References
Research domains
Research level

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy