SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Lundström Karl)
 

Search: WFRF:(Lundström Karl) > Training nuclei det...

Training nuclei detection algorithms with simple annotations

Kost, Henning (author)
Fraunhofer-Institut fur Bildgestutzte Medizin MEVIS,Fraunhofer Mevis
Homeyer, André (author)
Fraunhofer-Institut fur Bildgestutzte Medizin MEVIS,Fraunhofer Mevis
Molin, Jesper, 1987 (author)
Sectra AB,Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
show more...
Lundström, Claes, 1973- (author)
Linköpings universitet,Medie- och Informationsteknik,Centrum för medicinsk bildvetenskap och visualisering, CMIV,Tekniska fakulteten
Hahn, Horst Karl (author)
Fraunhofer-Institut fur Bildgestutzte Medizin MEVIS,Fraunhofer Mevis
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2017
2017
English.
In: Journal of Pathology Informatics. - : Elsevier BV. - 2229-5089 .- 2153-3539. ; 8:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: Generating good training datasets is essential for machine learning-based nuclei detection methods. However, creating exhaustive nuclei contour annotations, to derive optimal training data from, is often infeasible. Methods: We compared different approaches for training nuclei detection methods solely based on nucleus center markers. Such markers contain less accurate information, especially with regard to nuclear boundaries, but can be produced much easier and in greater quantities. The approaches use different automated sample extraction methods to derive image positions and class labels from nucleus center markers. In addition, the approaches use different automated sample selection methods to improve the detection quality of the classification algorithm and reduce the run time of the training process. We evaluated the approaches based on a previously published generic nuclei detection algorithm and a set of Ki-67-stained breast cancer images. Results: A Voronoi tessellation-based sample extraction method produced the best performing training sets. However, subsampling of the extracted training samples was crucial. Even simple class balancing improved the detection quality considerably. The incorporation of active learning led to a further increase in detection quality. Conclusions: With appropriate sample extraction and selection methods, nuclei detection algorithms trained on the basis of simple center marker annotations can produce comparable quality to algorithms trained on conventionally created training sets.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Medicinteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Medical Engineering (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Elektroteknik och elektronik -- Signalbehandling (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering -- Signal Processing (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Active learning
Machine learning
Nuclei detection
Training set generation

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view