SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Mendez Daniel)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Mendez Daniel) > How do Practitioner...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00005020naa a2200625 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:bth-20888
003SwePub
008210107s2022 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
009oai:gup.ub.gu.se/317141
0247 a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-208882 URI
0247 a https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.30427472 DOI
0247 a https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/3171412 URI
040 a (SwePub)bthd (SwePub)gu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
1001 a Franch, Xavieru Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, ESP4 aut
2451 0a How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research?
264 1b Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.c 2022
338 a print2 rdacarrier
500 a open access
520 a Context: The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is vital for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. Some authors have speculated about a mismatch between research and practice in the RE discipline. However, there is not much evidence to support or refute this perception. Objective: This paper presents the results of a study aimed at gathering evidence from practitioners about their perception of the relevance of RE research and at understanding the factors that influence that perception. Method: We conducted a questionnaire-based survey of industry practitioners with expertise in RE. The participants rated the perceived relevance of 435 scientific papers presented at five top RE-related conferences. Results: The 153 participants provided a total of 2,164 ratings. The practitioners rated RE research as essential or worthwhile in a majority of cases. However, the percentage of non-positive ratings is still higher than we would like. Among the factors that affect the perception of relevance are the paper?s links to industry, the research method used, and respondents? roles. The reasons for positive perceptions were primarily related to the relevance of the problem and the soundness of the solution, while the causes for negative perceptions were more varied. The respondents also provided suggestions for future research, including topics researchers have studied for decades, like elicitation or requirement quality criteria. Conclusions: The study is valuable for both researchers and practitioners. Researchers can use the reasons respondents gave for positive and negative perceptions and the suggested research topics to help make their research more appealing to practitioners and thus more prone to industry adoption. Practitioners can benefit from the overall view of contemporary RE research by learning about research topics that they may not be familiar with, and compare their perception with those of their colleagues to self-assess their positioning towards more academic research. IEEE
650 7a NATURVETENSKAPx Data- och informationsvetenskapx Programvaruteknik0 (SwePub)102052 hsv//swe
650 7a NATURAL SCIENCESx Computer and Information Sciencesx Software Engineering0 (SwePub)102052 hsv//eng
653 a Impact of Research
653 a Practitioners Perception
653 a Requirements Engineering
653 a Survey
653 a Surveys
653 a Academic research
653 a Perceived relevances
653 a Quality criteria
653 a research methods
653 a Research results
653 a Research topics
653 a Scientific papers
653 a Impact of Research
653 a Practitioners' perception
653 a Requirements Engineering
653 a Survey
7001 a Mendez, Danielu Blekinge Tekniska Högskola,Institutionen för programvaruteknik4 aut0 (Swepub:bth)dmz
7001 a Vogelsang, Andreasu Technische Universitat Berlin, DEU4 aut
7001 a Heldal, Rogardtu Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, NOR4 aut
7001 a Knauss, Eric,d 1977u Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik (GU),Department of Computer Science and Engineering (GU)4 aut0 (Swepub:gu)xknaer
7001 a Oriol, Marcu Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, ESP4 aut
7001 a Travassos, Guilhermeu Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, BRA4 aut
7001 a Carver, Jeffrey C.u University of Alabama, USA4 aut
7001 a Zimmermann, Thomasu Microsoft Corporation, USA4 aut
7102 a Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, ESPb Institutionen för programvaruteknik4 org
7730 t IEEE Transactions on Software Engineeringd : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.g 48:6, s. 1947-1964q 48:6<1947-1964x 0098-5589x 1939-3520
8564 u https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06013y arXiv.org
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-20888
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.3042747
8564 8u https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/317141

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy