SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Olofsson Thomas)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Olofsson Thomas) > Analysing the house...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003589naa a2200397 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:umu-160337
003SwePub
008190617s2019 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1603372 URI
024a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.0342 DOI
040 a (SwePub)umu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Azizi, Shoaib,d 1989-u Umeå universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad fysik och elektronik,Energy efficiency4 aut0 (Swepub:umu)shaz0006
2451 0a Analysing the house-owners’ perceptions on benefits and barriers of energy renovation in Swedish single-family houses
264 1b Elsevier,c 2019
338 a print2 rdacarrier
520 a Single-family houses offer a large potential for energy savings by energy renovation (ER). Homeowners’ motivation to implement ER derives from the benefits and barriers they perceive. Benefits are the positive consequences that can motivate homeowners to act and barriers are the challenges that demotivate them to undertake ER. Different benefits and barriers do not homogenously affect every homeowner. Identifying motivating benefits and demotivating barriers for each specific group among homeowners can shed lights on ER decision-making and enable policies that are more effective. The objective of this study is to contextualize the implementation of ER by understanding how the perceived benefits and barriers influence homeowners. This study links the expected consequences, which are benefits and barriers to the influential factors on ER, which are used to group the homeowners.The analysis is based on a questionnaire survey mailed to 1550 owners of single-family houses in northern Sweden. The perceptions of homeowners on benefits and barriers of ER are significantly different between the groups that are motivated and unmotivated to implement ER. Despite the perceived importance of some of the benefits such as energy cost reduction, they may not be determinative for the homeowners’ decision to undertake ER. The homeowners are more likely to implement ER for reasons other than energy use reduction such as for improving the indoor environment. The barriers such as the difficulty of finding a low-interest loan and reliable information sources are found to impede the intention to implement ER among different groups. Policy implications to facilitate ER in single-family houses are discussed.
650 7a TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIERx Naturresursteknikx Energisystem0 (SwePub)207022 hsv//swe
650 7a ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYx Environmental Engineeringx Energy Systems0 (SwePub)207022 hsv//eng
653 a Energy efficient renovation
653 a Investment decision
653 a Perceptions
653 a Implementation
653 a House-owners
653 a Sweden
653 a environmental science
653 a miljövetenskap
700a Nair, Gireeshu Umeå universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad fysik och elektronik4 aut0 (Swepub:umu)gigo0003
700a Olofsson, Thomas,d 1968-u Umeå universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad fysik och elektronik4 aut0 (Swepub:umu)thol0001
710a Umeå universitetb Institutionen för tillämpad fysik och elektronik4 org
773t Energy and Buildingsd : Elsevierg 198, s. 187-196q 198<187-196x 0378-7788x 1872-6178
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-160337
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.034

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Azizi, Shoaib, 1 ...
Nair, Gireesh
Olofsson, Thomas ...
Om ämnet
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER
TEKNIK OCH TEKNO ...
och Naturresurstekni ...
och Energisystem
Artiklar i publikationen
Energy and Build ...
Av lärosätet
Umeå universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy