SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Piper Ian)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Piper Ian) > Multicenter clinica...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003110naa a2200421 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:uu-152153
003SwePub
008110426s2008 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-1521532 URI
024a https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000335148.87042.D72 DOI
040 a (SwePub)uu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Citerio, Giuseppe4 aut
2451 0a Multicenter clinical assessment of the raumedic Neurovent-P intracranial pressure sensor :b A report by the brainIT group
264 1c 2008
338 a print2 rdacarrier
520 a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness and zero-drift of an intracranial pressure sensor, Neurovent-P (Raumedic AG, Munchberg, Germany), when used in the clinical environment. METHODS: A prospective multicenter trial, conforming to the International Organization for Standardization 14155 Standard, was conducted in 6 European BrainIT centers between July 2005 and December 2006. Ninety-nine catheters were used. The study was observational, followed by a centralized sensor bench test after catheter removal. RESULTS: The mean recorded value before probe insertion was 0.17 +/- 1.1 mm Hg. Readings outside the range 1 mm Hg were recorded in only 3 centers on a total of 15 catheters. Complications were minimal and mainly related to the insertion bolt. The mean recorded pressure value at removal was 0.8 +/- 2.2 mm Hg. No relationship was identified between postremoval reading and length of monitoring. The postremoval bench test indicated the probability of a system failure, defined as a drift of more than 3 mm Hg, at a range between 12 and 17%. CONCLUSION: The Neurovent-P catheter performed well in clinical use in terms of robustness. The majority of technical complications were associated with the bolt fixation technology. Adverse events were rare and clinically nonsignificant. Despite the earlier reported excellent bench test zero-drift rates, under the more demanding clinical conditions, zero-drift rate remains a concern with catheter tip strain gauge technology. This performance is similar, and not superior, to other intracranial pressure devices.
653 a Intracranial pressure
653 a Multicenter trials
653 a Physiological monitoring
653 a Technology assessment
653 a MEDICINE
653 a MEDICIN
700a Piper, Ian4 aut
700a Chambers, Iain R.4 aut
700a Galli, Davide4 aut
700a Enblad, Peru Uppsala universitet,Neurokirurgi4 aut0 (Swepub:uu)perenbla
700a Kiening, Karl4 aut
700a Ragauskas, Arminas4 aut
700a Sahuquillo, Juan4 aut
700a Gregson, Barbara4 aut
710a Uppsala universitetb Neurokirurgi4 org
773t Neurosurgeryg 63:6, s. 1152-1158q 63:6<1152-1158x 0148-396Xx 1524-4040
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-152153
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000335148.87042.D7

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy