SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

L773:1382 3256 OR L773:1573 7616
 

Sökning: L773:1382 3256 OR L773:1573 7616 > Machine learning ex...

Machine learning experiment management tools: a mixed-methods empirical study

Idowu, Samuel, 1985 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik, Software Engineering (GU),Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik, Software Engineering (GU)
Osman, Osman (författare)
Göteborgs universitet,University of Gothenburg
Struber, Daniel, 1986 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik, Software Engineering (GU),Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik, Software Engineering (GU)
visa fler...
Berger, Thorsten, 1981 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik, Software Engineering (GU),Institutionen för data- och informationsteknik, Software Engineering (GU)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2024
2024
Engelska.
Ingår i: Empirical Software Engineering. - 1573-7616 .- 1382-3256. ; 29:4
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Machine Learning (ML) experiment management tools support ML practitioners and software engineers when building intelligent software systems. By managing large numbers of ML experiments comprising many different ML assets, they not only facilitate engineering ML models and ML-enabled systems, but also managing their evolution—for instance, tracing system behavior to concrete experiments when the model performance drifts. However, while ML experiment management tools have become increasingly popular, little is known about their effectiveness in practice, as well as their actual benefits and challenges. We present a mixed-methods empirical study of experiment management tools and the support they provide to users. First, our survey of 81 ML practitioners sought to determine the benefits and challenges of ML experiment management and of the existing tool landscape. Second, a controlled experiment with 15 student developers investigated the effectiveness of ML experiment management tools. We learned that 70% of our survey respondents perform ML experiments using specialized tools, while out of those who do not use such tools, 52% are unaware of experiment management tools or of their benefits. The controlled experiment showed that experiment management tools offer valuable support to users to systematically track and retrieve ML assets. Using ML experiment management tools reduced error rates and increased completion rates. By presenting a user’s perspective on experiment management tools, and the first controlled experiment in this area, we hope that our results foster the adoption of these tools in practice, as well as they direct tool builders and researchers to improve the tool landscape overall.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Maskinteknik -- Produktionsteknik, arbetsvetenskap och ergonomi (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Mechanical Engineering -- Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Företagsekonomi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business -- Business Administration (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Programvaruteknik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Software Engineering (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Artifacts
ML lifecycle
Machine learning
Asset management
Experiment management
Tools
Machine learning
Experiment management
Artifacts
Asset management
Tools
ML lifecycle

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy