SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Argenziano G)
 

Search: WFRF:(Argenziano G) > The impact of dermo...

  • Forsea, A MCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (author)

The impact of dermoscopy on melanoma detection in the practice of dermatologists in Europe : results of a pan-European survey

  • Article/chapterEnglish2017

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2017-02-21
  • Wiley,2017

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:8a154aad-e020-4cb6-a81c-e49c03473d9f
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8a154aad-e020-4cb6-a81c-e49c03473d9fURI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14129DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype

Notes

  • BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy is a widely used technique that can increase the sensitivity and specificity of melanoma detection. Information is lacking on the impact of dermoscopy use on the detection of melanoma in the real-life practice of European dermatologists.OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that influence the benefit of using dermoscopy for increasing melanoma detection and lowering the number of unnecessary biopsies in the practice of European dermatologists.METHODS: We conducted a survey of dermatologists registered in 32 European countries regarding the following: the demographic and practice characteristics, dermoscopy training and use, opinions on dermoscopy and the self-estimated impact of dermoscopy use on the number of melanomas detected and the number of unnecessary biopsies performed in practice.RESULTS: Valid answers were collected for 7480 respondents, of which 6602 reported using dermoscopy. Eighty-six per cent of dermoscopy users reported that dermoscopy increased the numbers of melanomas they detected, and 70% reported that dermoscopy decreased the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions they performed. The dermatologists reporting these benefits were more likely to have received dermoscopy training during residency, to use dermoscopy frequently and intensively, and to use digital dermoscopy systems and pattern analysis compared to dermatologists who did not perceive any benefit of dermoscopy for the melanoma recognition in their practice.CONCLUSIONS: Improving dermoscopy training, especially during residency and increasing access to digital dermoscopy equipment are important paths to enhance the benefit of dermoscopy for melanoma detection in the practice of European dermatologists.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Tschandl, PMedical University of Vienna (author)
  • Zalaudek, IMedical University of Graz (author)
  • Del Marmol, VUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) (author)
  • Soyer, H PUniversity of Queensland (author)
  • Argenziano, GUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli (author)
  • Geller, A CHarvard University (author)
  • Nielsen, KariLund University,Lunds universitet,Lunds Melanomstudiegrupp,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Lund Melanoma Study Group,Lund University Research Groups(Swepub:lu)med-kni (author)
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and PharmacyMedical University of Vienna (creator_code:org_t)
  • Eurodermoscopy Working Group

Related titles

  • In:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: Wiley31:7, s. 1148-11561468-30830926-9959

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view