SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-193006"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-193006" > Consensus based rec...

Consensus based recommendations for the diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: an international Delphi study

Bogaerts, Joep M. A. (författare)
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Netherlands; Radboudumc, Netherlands
van Bommel, Majke H. D. (författare)
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Netherlands
Hermens, Rosella P. M. G. (författare)
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Netherlands
visa fler...
Steenbeek, Miranda P. (författare)
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Netherlands
de Hullu, Joanne A. (författare)
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Netherlands
van der Laak, Jeroen (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för diagnostik och specialistmedicin,Medicinska fakulteten,Centrum för medicinsk bildvetenskap och visualisering, CMIV,Region Östergötland, Klinisk patologi,Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Netherlands
Simons, Michiel (författare)
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Netherlands
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2023-03-20
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Histopathology. - : WILEY. - 0309-0167 .- 1365-2559. ; 83:1, s. 67-79
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • AimReliably diagnosing or safely excluding serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a precursor lesion of tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), is crucial for individual patient care, for better understanding the oncogenesis of HGSC, and for safely investigating novel strategies to prevent tubo-ovarian carcinoma. To optimize STIC diagnosis and increase its reproducibility, we set up a three-round Delphi study. Methods and resultsIn round 1, an international expert panel of 34 gynecologic pathologists, from 11 countries, was assembled to provide input regarding STIC diagnosis, which was used to develop a set of statements. In round 2, the panel rated their level of agreement with those statements on a 9-point Likert scale. In round 3, statements without previous consensus were rated again by the panel while anonymously disclosing the responses of the other panel members. Finally, each expert was asked to approve or disapprove the complete set of consensus statements. The panel indicated their level of agreement with 64 statements. A total of 27 statements (42%) reached consensus after three rounds. These statements reflect the entire diagnostic work-up for pathologists, regarding processing and macroscopy (three statements); microscopy (eight statements); immunohistochemistry (nine statements); interpretation and reporting (four statements); and miscellaneous (three statements). The final set of consensus statements was approved by 85%. ConclusionThis study provides an overview of current clinical practice regarding STIC diagnosis amongst expert gynecopathologists. The experts consensus statements form the basis for a set of recommendations, which may help towards more consistent STIC diagnosis.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Delphi study; diagnostic consensus criteria; high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC); serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy