SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Storey Robert F.)
 

Search: WFRF:(Storey Robert F.) > (2010-2014) > Ticagrelor Versus C...

Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes in Relation to Renal Function Results From the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial

James, Stefan (author)
Uppsala universitet,Uppsala kliniska forskningscentrum (UCR)
Budaj, Andrzej (author)
Aylward, Philip (author)
show more...
Buck, Kristen K. (author)
Cannon, Christopher P. (author)
Cornel, Jan H. (author)
Harrington, Robert A. (author)
Horrow, Jay (author)
Katus, Hugo (author)
Keltai, Matyas (author)
Lewis, Basil S. (author)
Parikh, Keyur (author)
Storey, Robert F. (author)
Szummer, Karolina (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Wojdyla, Daniel (author)
Wallentin, Lars (author)
Uppsala universitet,Uppsala kliniska forskningscentrum (UCR)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2010
2010
English.
In: Circulation. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 122:11, s. 1056-1067
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background-Reduced renal function is associated with a poorer prognosis and increased bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes and may therefore alter the risk-benefit ratio with antiplatelet therapies. In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduced the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 12 months but with similar major bleeding rates. Methods and Results-Central laboratory serum creatinine levels were available in 15 202 (81.9%) acute coronary syndrome patients at baseline, and creatinine clearance, estimated by the Cockcroft Gault equation, was calculated. In patients with chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min; n = 3237), ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced the primary end point to 17.3% from 22.0% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.90) with an absolute risk reduction greater than that of patients with normal renal function (n = 11 965): 7.9% versus 8.9% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02). In patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor reduced total mortality (10.0% versus 14.0%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.89). Major bleeding rates, fatal bleedings, and non-coronary bypass-related major bleedings were not significantly different between the 2 randomized groups (15.1% versus 14.3%; HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.30; 0.34% versus 0.77%; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.54; and 8.5% versus 7.3%; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.68). The interactions between creatinine clearance and randomized treatment on any of the outcome variables were nonsignificant. Conclusions-In acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduces ischemic end points and mortality without a significant increase in major bleeding but with numerically more non-procedure-related bleeding.

Keyword

acute coronary syndrome
bleeding
clopidogrel
mortality
myocardial infarction
renal function
MEDICINE
MEDICIN

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view