Sökning: WFRF:(Schön Ulla Karin)
> Nyholm Maria 1962 >
Shared decision mak...
Shared decision making in community mental health services - an evaluation of three self-reporting instruments
-
- Rosenberg, David, 1957- (författare)
- Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
-
- Schön, Ulla-Karin, 1970- (författare)
- Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
-
- Nyholm, Maria, 1962- (författare)
- Högskolan i Halmstad,Hälsa och idrott
-
visa fler...
-
- Grim, Katarina, 1971- (författare)
- Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
-
- Svedberg, Petra, 1973- (författare)
- Högskolan i Halmstad,Hälsofrämjande processer,Hälsa och omvårdnad
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2016-07-23
- 2017
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Journal of Mental Health. - Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge. - 0963-8237 .- 1360-0567. ; 26:2, s. 142-149
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa fler...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Background: Despite the potential impact of shared decision making on users satisfaction with care and quality in health care decisions, there is a lack of knowledge and skills regarding how to work with shared decision making among health care providers.Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of three instruments that measure varied dimensions of shared decision making, based on self-reports by clients, in a Swedish community mental health context.Method: The study sample consisted of 121 clients with experience of community mental health care, and involved in a wide range of decisions regarding both social support and treatment. The questionnaires were examined for face and content validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity.Results: The instruments displayed good face and content validity, satisfactory internal consistency and a moderate to good level of stability in test-retest reliability with fair to moderate construct correlations, in a sample of clients with serious mental illness and experience of community mental health services in Sweden.Conclusions: The questionnaires are considered to be relevant to the decision making process, user-friendly and appropriate in a Swedish community mental health care context. They functioned well in settings where non-medical decisions, regarding social and support services, are the primary focus. The use of instruments that measure various dimensions of the self-reported experience of clients, can be a key factor in developing knowledge of how best to implement shared decision making in mental health services.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology (hsv//eng)
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Psykiatri (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Psychiatry (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Recovery
- mental illness
- questionnaire
- shared decision making
- reliability
- validity
- Public Health Science
- Folkhälsovetenskap
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas