SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kau-65076"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kau-65076" > Investigating the I...

Investigating the Intertwinement of Knowledge, Value, and Experience of Upper Secondary Students' Argumentation Concerning Socioscientific Issues

Rundgren, Carl-Johan, 1973- (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Institutionen för matematikämnets och naturvetenskapsämnenas didaktik,Stockholm Univ, Dept Math & Sci Educ, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Eriksson, Martin, 1972- (författare)
Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för ingenjörs- och kemivetenskaper (from 2013)
Rundgren, Shu-Nu Chang, 1975- (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för ingenjörs- och kemivetenskaper (from 2013),Stockholm University, Dept Educ, Stockholm, Sweden.,Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik
 (creator_code:org_t)
2016-11-24
2016
Engelska.
Ingår i: Science & Education. - Dordrecht, Netherlands : Springer Netherlands. - 0926-7220 .- 1573-1901. ; 25:9-10, s. 1049-1071
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • This study aims to explore students' argumentation and decision-making relating to an authentic socioscientific issue (SSI)-the problem of environmental toxins in fish from the Baltic Sea. A multi-disciplinary instructional module, designed in order to develop students' skills to argue about complex SSI, was successfully tested. Seven science majors in the final year of their upper secondary studies participated in this study. Their argumentation and decision-making processes were followed closely, and data were collected during multiple stages of the instructional module: group discussions were audio recorded, the participants wrote reports on their decision making, and postexercise interviews were conducted with individual students. The analysis focused on the skill of evaluation demonstrated by the students during the exercise and the relationships between the knowledge, values, and experiences that they used in their argumentation. Even though all of the students had access to the same information and agreed on the factual aspects of the issue, they came to different decisions. All of the students took counter-arguments and the limitations of their claims into account and were able to extend their claims where appropriate. However, their decisions differed depending on their background knowledge, values, and experiences (i.e., their intellectual baggage). The implication to SSI teaching and learning is discussed.

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Kemi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Chemical Sciences (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Utbildningsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Educational Sciences (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Utbildningsvetenskap -- Didaktik (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Educational Sciences -- Didactics (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Socio-scientific issues
decision-making
science-education
school science
patterns
discussions
framework
thinking
inquiry
reasons
Kemi
Chemistry
Education
Pedagogik
Didactics

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy