SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-5396"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-5396" > Midwifery care :

Midwifery care : development of an instrument to measure quality based on the World Health Organization's classification of care in normal birth

Sandin Bojö, A-K (författare)
Karlstads universitet,Fakulteten för samhälls- och livsvetenskaper,Div. for Health and Caring Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
Hall-Lord, M-L (författare)
Karlstads universitet,Fakulteten för samhälls- och livsvetenskaper,Div. for Health and Caring Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
Axelsson, O (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för kvinnors och barns hälsa,Obstetrisk forskning/Axelsson,Dept. Women's and Children's Hlth., Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
visa fler...
Udén, Giggi (författare)
Malmö högskola,Fakulteten för hälsa och samhälle (HS)
Wilde Larsson, B (författare)
Karlstads universitet,Fakulteten för samhälls- och livsvetenskaper,Div. for Health and Caring Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Blackwell Munksgaard, 2004
2004
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Nursing. - : Blackwell Munksgaard. - 0962-1067 .- 1365-2702. ; 13, s. 75-
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Aims and objectives: The aim of the study was to develop an instrument to measure midwifery care in relation to World Health Organization's classification of care in normal birth and to test the instrument for content validity and inter-rater reliability.Methods: The Delphi method was used for development of the instrument and to elicit evidence of content validity. Six experts from three different geographical regions in Sweden, representing clinically working midwives, lecturers in midwifery and obstetricians, participated in the first part of the study. The instrument was tested for inter-rater reliability in an exploratory study by two midwives and one of the authors. Data were analysed using percentage of agreement level and the Kappa coefficient.Results: Five expert rounds were needed to reach consensus for content validity. The inter-rater reliability test showed high agreement levels (95.9, 94.2 and 95.7%) and good to very good Kappa coefficients (0.74-1.0). The final instrument consisted of 78 items divided into five sections: background (five items); practices which are demonstrably useful and should be encouraged (55 items); practices which are clearly harmful or ineffective and should be eliminated (five items); practices for which insufficient evidence exists to support a clear recommendation and which should be used with caution while further research clarifies the issue (four items); and finally practices which are frequently used inappropriately (nine items).Conclusions and relevance to clinical practice: The instrument can be used at a labour ward to measure documented care and quality of midwifery care. The results can be used to identify areas for improvements, to develop guidelines towards evidence-based care and to improve documentation. However, the present study should be regarded as an exploratory study and the feasibility of the instrument remains to be tested in empirical studies.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy