SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-5639"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-5639" > Including systemati...

Including systematic reviews in PhD programmes and candidatures in nursing : 'Hobson's choice'?

Olsson, Cecilia, 1971- (författare)
Karlstads universitet,Avdelningen för omvårdnad
Ringnér, Anders, 1975- (författare)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för omvårdnad,Umea Univ, Dept Nursing, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden.
Borglin, Gunilla (författare)
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola,Malmö högskola,Institutionen för vårdvetenskap (VV),Blekinge tekniska högskola, Malmö högskola,Blekinge Inst Technol, Dept Hlth Sci, SE-37971 Karlskrona, Sweden.;Malmo Univ, Fac Hlth & Soc, SE-20506 Malmo, Sweden.,Institutionen för hälsa
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2014
2014
Engelska.
Ingår i: Nurse Education in Practice. - : Elsevier. - 1471-5953 .- 1873-5223. ; 14:2, s. 102-105
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Nowadays, gathering and synthesising evidence, i.e. conducting systematic reviews, is considered an important part of any health service research endeavour. Reviewing the literature, however suggest that it is not yet common that PhD students/doctoral candidates publish systematic reviews or even include a high quality review of the literature as a part of their PhD programme or candidature. Implying that systematic reviewing skills might not be acquired by going through an education on a postgraduate level. Additionally, scholars debating systematic reviews 'to be or not to be' as a part of research training seem to be sparse, especially within the field of nursing. In this issue for debate, we would like to propose that the absence of systematic reviews' in this context might severely hamper the 'up and coming' researchers as well as the research conducted. We envisage that this lack can have a negative impact on international nursing practice, and therefore propose that systematic reviews should be considered, whenever appropriate, as a mandatory part of any PhD programme or candidature. We believe that abilities in systematic reviewing will be a sought after research skills in the near future. Including systematic reviews would promote i) refined, well-grounded adequate research questions, ii) PhDs with broad and elevated methodological skills, iii) an increased level of evidence based nursing praxis. However, to make this a reality, supervisors, PhD students, and candidates would need to understand the value of this kind of research activity. Finally, lobbying University faculty boards and grant providers that are not inclined to view literature reviews as 'proper' research or as an important part of health service research, needs to be put on the agenda.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Meta-analysis
Meta-synthesis
Mixed studies reviews
Nursing
PhD theses
Systematic reviews
Curriculum
Education
Nursing
Graduate
Evidence-Based Nursing
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Nursing Research
Review Literature as Topic
Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
omvårdnadsforskning med medicinsk inriktning
Nursing Science

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy