SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-19810"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-19810" > The heterogeneity o...

The heterogeneity of socially responsible investment

Sandberg, Joakim, 1979 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori,Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science,Department of Philosophy, University of Gothenburg
Juravle, Carmen (författare)
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, U.K.
Hedesström, Martin, 1969 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Psykologiska institutionen,Department of Psychology,Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg
visa fler...
Hamilton, Ian, 1965- (författare)
Umeå universitet,Handelshögskolan vid Umeå universitet (USBE)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2008-10-14
2008
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Business Ethics. - Dordrecht : D. Reidel. - 0167-4544 .- 1573-0697. ; 87:4, s. 519-533
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Many writers have commented on the heterogeneity of the socially responsible investment (SRI) movement. However, few have actually tried to understand and explain it, and even fewer have discussed whether the opposite – standardisation – is possible and desirable. In this article, we take a broader perspective on the issue of the heterogeneity of SRI. We distinguish between four levels on which heterogeneity can be found: the terminological, definitional, strategic and practical. Whilst there is much talk about the definitional ambiguities of SRI, we suggest that there is actually some agreement on the definitional level. There are at least three explanations which we suggest can account for the heterogeneity on the other levels: cultural and ideological differences between different regions, differences in values, norms and ideology between various SRI stakeholders, and the market setting of SRI. Discussing the implications of the three explanations for the SRI market, we suggest that there is reason to be sceptical about the possibilities of standardisation if not standardisation is imposed top-down. Whether this kind of standardisation is desirable or not, we argue, depends on what the motives for it would be. To the extent that standardisation may facilitate the mainstreaming of SRI, it could be a good thing – but we entertain doubts about whether mainstreaming really requires standardisation.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Företagsekonomi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business -- Business Administration (hsv//eng)
HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Filosofi (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Philosophy (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

ambiguity
business ethics
definitions
ethical investment
heterogeneity
mainstreaming
responsible investment
socially responsible investment
standardisation
sustainable investment
Business studies
Företagsekonomi
företagsekonomi
Business Studies
ambiguity - business ethics - definitions - ethical investment - heterogeneity - mainstreaming - responsible investment - socially responsible investment - standardisation - sustainable investment

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy