SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/314614"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/314614" > Restrictive spirome...

Restrictive spirometry versus restrictive lung function using the GLI reference values

Myrberg, Tomi (författare)
Umeå universitet,Anestesiologi och intensivvård
Lindberg, Anne (författare)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för medicin
Eriksson, Berne (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Krefting Research Centre,Department of Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Research and Development, Region Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
visa fler...
Hedman, Linnea, 1979- (författare)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för hållbar hälsa
Stridsman, Caroline (författare)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för medicin
Lundbäck, B. (författare)
Department of Research and Development, Region Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
Rönmark, Eva (författare)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för hållbar hälsa
Backman, Helena (författare)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för hållbar hälsa
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-02-28
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. - : Wiley. - 1475-0961 .- 1475-097X. ; 42:3, s. 181-189
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: Restrictive lung function may indicate various underlying diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different restrictive spirometry patterns (RSPs) to identify restrictive lung function (total lung capacity [TLC] < lower limit of normal [LLN]) according to reference values by the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) in a wide age-ranged, general population sample. Methods: A general population sample (n = 607, age 23–72 years, smokers 18.8%) with proper dynamic spirometry and TLC measurements, was included. Accuracy of two main categories of RSP to identify TLC < LLN were evaluated: traditional RSPs (definition 1: FVC < 80% of predicted and FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7 and definition 2: FVC < LLN and FEV1/FVC ≥ LLN) and RSPs defined by Youden's method (definition 3: FVC < 85.5% of predicted and FEV1/FVC ≥ LLN and definition 4: FVC Z-score < −1.0 and FEV1/FVC ≥ LLN). Results: The prevalence of restrictive lung function (TLC < LLN) was 5.3%. The most accurate cut-offs for FVC to identify TLC < LLN were 85.5% for FVC% of predicted, and −1.0 for FVC Z-score. The traditional RSP definitions 1 and 2 had higher specificity (95.0% and 96.9%) but substantially lower sensitivity compared to RSP definitions 3 and 4. Conclusion: Based on the GLI reference values, the RSP definition FVC < LLN and FEV1/FVC ≥ LLN yielded the highest specificity and may appropriately be used to rule out restrictive lung function. The RSP definition with the most favourable trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, FVC < 85.5% of predicted and FEV1/FVC ≥ LLN, may serve as an alternative with higher sensitivity for screening. © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Lungmedicin och allergi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Respiratory Medicine and Allergy (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

epidemiology
respiratory function tests
restrictive lung function
restrictive spirometry pattern
spirometry
total lung capacity
epidemiology

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy